| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:24 |
 birdy247 |
Ill jist |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:24 |
birdy247 |
use slack :) .... jokes |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:24 |
birdy247 |
oh right, you mean the snippet |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:24 |
hmic |
how do i access that? |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:24 |
birdy247 |
Why? |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:23 |
hmic |
birdy247: fail! |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:23 |
birdy247 |
File uploaded https://cakesf.slack.com/files/U0T295QA3/F86D4CEMN/-.php / https://slack-files.com/T053DPNCM-F86D4CEMN-19077c1b38 |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:22 |
admad |
the class that is |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:22 |
admad |
show your Permissions table |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:22 |
birdy247 |
if i use permissiongroups it works instead of PermissionGroups |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:21 |
admad |
maybe cause there isn't any? |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:21 |
birdy247 |
@admad I tried that and no permission-groups are returned |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:20 |
hmic |
:~ |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:20 |
hmic |
whats what i said @admad, then check if you got the correct table instance - because... |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:19 |
hmic |
actually the table is a beast, the entity just an easy and lightweight data object ;-) |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:19 |
admad |
@birdy247 TableRegistry::get('PermissionsManager.Permissions')->get($entity->id, ['contain' => ['PermissionGroups']]); |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:18 |
hmic |
completely different beasts |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:18 |
hmic |
obinoob, they don't. |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:18 |
hmic |
so you set it up that way yourself ?! |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:18 |
obinoob |
hmic: ok so a table object has nothing in common with an entity I get that since they are two different structures guess internals are different I deeply though they share some common class etc |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:17 |
hmic |
i'd maybe try find() with the fluid syntax instead of get() too, because it has way more options to work on |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:17 |
birdy247 |
but debugging the Permissions table, shows the association in lowercase |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:17 |
hmic |
maybe you make sure you have the correct table object first and the association is available there |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:17 |
birdy247 |
I thought what you suggested |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:16 |
birdy247 |
I am curiours as to why it works with lower case |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:16 |
hmic |
birdy247: it's just a suggestion. sorry if it does not apply to your problem at hand... |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:16 |
birdy247 |
it then says its not associated with the plugin |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:15 |
birdy247 |
hmic that doesnt work |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:15 |
hmic |
now you have the table object - which still has nothing in common with an entity object |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:15 |
hmic |
and it gives you the table object back you ask for |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:14 |
hmic |
the registry holds your table objects, like its name suggests |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:14 |
hmic |
this is it's job! |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:14 |
obinoob |
and thus my doubts |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:14 |
obinoob |
hmic: that object it gives you an easy way for accessing your applications table instances as well... |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:10 |
hmic |
and still, this has nothing in common with an entity too, but can ask a datasource to get you entities, or create ones to pass to a datasource for persisting them |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:10 |
hmic |
it's only purpose is to get you to a table object you ask for |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:09 |
hmic |
the tableregistry is a *registry* |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:09 |
hmic |
ahm? nope! |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:09 |
obinoob |
hmic: never thought much about TableRegistry... they behave much like Entities to my eyes as I tend to use them when I can't use an Entity! I guess I need to read some basics |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:07 |
hmic |
and have absolutely nothing in common with the tableregistry |
| # |
Nov 29th 2017, 13:07 |
obinoob |
as book says |