| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:54 |
 thinkingmedia |
Unless that component was already loaded by the controller with loadComponent() |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:54 |
thinkingmedia |
well, if you set $component property to lazy load another component. That other component will not get initialized or startup invoked at all. |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:51 |
hmic |
can you show code? |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:50 |
thinkingmedia |
If a component lazy loads a child component the "startup" is not fired. Is this correct behavior? |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:11 |
spriz |
I actually had deployed with my fork, but then reverted since I didn't know if it had unknown consequences :) |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:11 |
spriz |
Yeah as long as I didn't know if it was intended :) It might introduce a ton of unwanted (untested) changes :P |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:11 |
hmic |
you might want to learn some composer magic instead ;-) |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:10 |
hmic |
instead of using your fixed fork of the Crud plugin till the fix is accepted? wow! |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:09 |
spriz |
I'll let it be for now then, just added 1k lines for empty functions to our code base anyway :,) |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:09 |
hmic |
i still think your PR is correct though! |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:08 |
spriz |
but that doens't make it right |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:08 |
spriz |
it worked without issues for years :P |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:08 |
spriz |
aye |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:07 |
hmic |
call it whatever, it needed to be there before, didn't it? without calling crud->execute() crud would not do anything in your controller actions |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:07 |
spriz |
It doesn't do anything and serve(d) no purpose prior to 3.3 (including in 2.x) |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:06 |
spriz |
at least line 33 -> 56 |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:06 |
spriz |
I'd call this boilerplate: https://gist.github.com/Spriz/30cd4559f5671e5b20d4706a550320d8 :P |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:06 |
hmic |
probably thats why nobody hit the issue before, since 3.3 is out for quite some time already... |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:05 |
hmic |
spritz: that's not boilerplate. thats what *any crud mapped action* needs to do! call Crud->execute()! |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:05 |
hmic |
still, you are correct with your suggested pr, following the (not so) recent changes in the cakephp request cycle regarding the authcomponent |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:04 |
spriz |
okay @hmic :slightly_smiling_face: that's fair enough - we'll just add this boilerplate all over :) |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:04 |
hmic |
if it does not - thats a problem on it's own! |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:03 |
hmic |
*any* crud mapped action is to call Crud->execute()! |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:03 |
admad |
cya'll |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:03 |
hmic |
spritz: i don't consider this a problem |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:02 |
admad |
i avoid commenting when i can't really help, unless it's my personal repo |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:01 |
spriz |
just wanted to hear if it was "do'h, don't want to answer that" or "Don't have time for assisting with the test" :muscle: |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:01 |
spriz |
@admad aye, it's https://github.com/FriendsOfCake/crud/pull/534 :slightly_smiling_face: And fair enough :muscle: |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:00 |
admad |
@spriz I presume the "serious" one you are referring to is #534. I at least don't have time right now to help you with test case. |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 15:00 |
hmic |
i dont quite care. the only one that matters to me is the jwt alg fix, as its really bad thing if you are talking jwt to 3rd party services and they can compomise your data that easily... |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:58 |
admad |
hmic: any other PRs of yours i have missed? :slightly_smiling_face: |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:57 |
admad |
"allowedAlgs" was a silly choice of key name, but meh :P |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:56 |
hmic |
:d |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:56 |
admad |
i'll take care of it later today |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:56 |
hmic |
jap! |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:56 |
admad |
gotcha, avoiding merging of algos is better in any case |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:56 |
hmic |
and can be used to sign a hs256, as your default config adds that method in any case! |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:56 |
admad |
ah |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:55 |
hmic |
but when using rs256 the key is public |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:55 |
admad |
"..create a good signature with just the public key" well the key used for HS265 isn't public key. You are supposed to keep it protected. |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:55 |
admad |
guess i am getting old then |