| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:55 |
 admad |
"..create a good signature with just the public key" well the key used for HS265 isn't public key. You are supposed to keep it protected. |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:55 |
admad |
guess i am getting old then |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:55 |
hmic |
both are just 1 liners, should be a minutes work |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:54 |
hmic |
we have talked about it here 4 weeks ago :/ you even left a comment on gh... |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:54 |
HenriqueMachado |
Somebody has an example of a follow system (like twitter) working on cake 3.4? |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:54 |
admad |
hmic: i must have missed notifications for that (or GH gobbled up notification), will check it soon |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:51 |
hmic |
the wrong bearer verification that does not allow basic auth to be used in conjunction with jwt is not that serve and you have provided a workaround in the issue already - while not fixing the cause back then :d |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:50 |
hmic |
admad: i'm talking at least this one: https://github.com/ADmad/cakephp-jwt-auth/pull/54 |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:49 |
spriz |
but what I wanted was to ask if I misunderstood something :slightly_smiling_face: |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:49 |
spriz |
@admad you commented at one of the, the other one I consider rather serious compared to :) |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:49 |
hmic |
one is a really bad security issue! |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:48 |
admad |
you have made PRs? :P |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:48 |
hmic |
have been 4 weeks in china, still they are open :p |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:48 |
hmic |
why don't you pick up on my PRs? |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:48 |
hmic |
admad: speaking of which... |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:45 |
admad |
if you pushed new updates within previous 24hrs be patient |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:45 |
admad |
@spriz i already responded to your PRs |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:27 |
spriz |
,:) * |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:27 |
spriz |
@hmic just keen to get feedback on a PR ,:( |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:26 |
hmic |
i'm not. but whats wrong spriz? |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:13 |
spriz |
Thanks @cleptric :raised_hands: |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:13 |
cleptric |
@spriz -> friendsofcake |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 14:12 |
spriz |
Any FoC/Crud maintainers around? :tada: |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 13:43 |
npm.i.sniggsnack |
+i'm |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 13:41 |
npm.i.sniggsnack |
@redvelvet thank you trying to fix this up |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 13:27 |
TVSET |
I'm an idiot ... there is no need to flatten the data ... :) |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 13:23 |
HenriqueMachado |
and this is the "follow" function: https://pastebin.com/6fWYwFiR |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 13:22 |
bernat |
npm, I'd try to put it in the model via custom finders or some filtering method, and called from the controller. Nothing in the view. |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 13:11 |
npm.i.sniggsnack |
if you guys would have a view with a list - but specific users should see specific things in that list - where would you filter the data? controller or view ? atm i'd go for the controller and give the filtered data to the view to have a minimum of "logic" in my view.. is that right? |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 13:08 |
chris-andre |
@hmic When I do update, Sessions.data is still the same. It did not change |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 13:06 |
HenriqueMachado |
Hello! What is wrog with my models? When i trie to save a "follow" a new user is added: https://pastebin.com/nvQzch2G |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 12:59 |
hmic |
thats the whole point of database sessions after all (well, you can have a simple *small* loadbalancer setup with multiple frontend webservers and a central (session) database too, but it's not a good thing to scale out further and usually not fast anyways. still you would keep the sessiondatabase server separated from your application database server in this kind of setup) |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 12:57 |
hmic |
all the data will be loaded from the database at each and every request! |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 12:57 |
hmic |
chris-andre: with database sessions you do not need to care at all! |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 12:55 |
slackebot |
bad approach? :P So, how would I flag it, and how shall I look for that flag? |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 12:55 |
chris-andre |
But okay. So critical data should be updated. Admin need to "find the session" of the logged in user if he's logged in, right? To do that I will need a join table. And to let the currently logged in user "know" that critical updates are made by admin, I have to flag it some way, and I thought SessionsUsers.flag_update (bool) could do that. And again, to make sure I don't miss that flag, I will have to query that table upon every request. |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 12:50 |
TVSET |
the print_r prints an empty array ... any idea on what I'm doing wrong? |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 12:50 |
chris-andre |
So if an admin changes a users first_name, you would care about updating. Thats not critical and can wait until next login. |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 12:50 |
TVSET |
I have a weird issue with CakePHP 3 Hash ... here's the pastebin: https://pastebin.com/RkZpyKqj |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 12:49 |
TVSET |
hello :) |
| # |
May 29th 2017, 12:49 |
inoas |
just put them on an SSD :p |