| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 11:01 |
 dorxy |
@hmic I think I'm trying to do something that is not supported in the marshaller, I might have to extend find in B and always contain on C by default |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:55 |
technofection |
yo ! But now need to go back and find out the location where I read that earlier.. LOL :slightly_smiling_face: |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:54 |
hmic |
hurray! you found the light switch in the dark :) |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:47 |
technofection |
Hi @hmic, you caught me! The main entity is not dirty! And now I remember, somewhere I read that while pushing entities to hasMany relationship array, I need to manually mark it dirty! |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:46 |
sjundee |
Hi. I use CookieComponent, and to set expiring date I use `$this->Cookie->configKey('Employee', ['expires' => '+365 days']);`, but the cookie expires in 1 month. Any Ideas? |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:34 |
dorxy |
Or maybe I'm trying to achieve something thats not possible |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:27 |
dorxy |
I’m already satisfied with a nudge in the right direction of where to look inside the marshaller class :) |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:26 |
dorxy |
and then on the patched entity the property `B` becomes an array of actual entities of type B, but its own association with C is not loaded, it is just `c_id` |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:25 |
dorxy |
so I’m patching with data like `[‘B’ => [[‘id’ => 1, |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:25 |
dorxy |
it’s just the patch that does not load actual entities more then one level deep |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:25 |
dorxy |
save strategy is append |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:24 |
dorxy |
oh yeah its an array, trying to keep it simple with the ABC ;) saving goes perfectly (although I’m not trying to save any associated entities themselves) |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:24 |
hmic |
if the associated entity marked dirty in the main entity? |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:23 |
hmic |
did you provide an array to the associated option specifing it? whats your save strategy on the asociation? did the same data save in the first place, or is your data structure wrong maybe? |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:21 |
technofection |
@hmic The bottom line is, I already have some records in the hasMany associaton and now wnated to push another new one... So I'd fetch the main entity along with contain, and then push a new entity in the hasMany association array, save the main entity back... This should create a new reocrd in the hasMany table.. But its not doing so :( |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:20 |
dorxy |
I’ve checked the `_buildPropertyMap` function in the marshaller, which created an anonymous function for association B with `['associated' => ['C']]`, but when I try to debug inside that anonymous function it seems to never be called :( |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:18 |
dorxy |
Could someone help me with associations maybe? I’ve got the following entities: A hasMany B and B belongsTo C containing on those entities works, but when I patch an entity with `['associated' => 'B.C']` in the options, C is not loaded as an entity onto B, but I do require it when someone submits a form and there are errors |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:17 |
technofection |
I already have one, and pushed another one in the entity array.. The new one I pushed into the array is not saving, neither there is any error in the main entity :( |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:16 |
technofection |
https://gist.github.com/technofection/f25941b073061eba41b758f9e6f3db47 |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:16 |
hmic |
if you provide only one, it will replace the ones with what you save by the default save strategy |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:15 |
hmic |
check the save strategy on the association |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:15 |
hmic |
!tell technofection about gist |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:15 |
slackebot |
[phone_country_id] => [phone_type_id] => 1 [status] => 0 ) [1] => Array ( [phone_type_id] => 2 [phone] = 2323232323 ) ) ) |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:15 |
technofection |
Array ( [id] => 91 [first_name] => My [middle_name] => [last_name] => Brother [email] => lkjlkj@sdfsdf.co> [birth_date] => [gender] => [preferred_name] => [social_security_number] => [person_phone_numbers] => Array ( [0] => Array ( [id] => 68 [person_id] => 91 [phone] => 7679748636 |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:14 |
technofection |
I want to add another phone number in the PersonsPhoneNumbers |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:13 |
technofection |
Now in Persons table I have one person and then I have one record in PersonPhoneNumbers |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:12 |
technofection |
I have an association like Person HasMany PersonPhoneNumbers |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:10 |
technofection |
Not really.. give me a moment... On a call :slightly_smiling_face: |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:10 |
hmic |
technofection: does this answer your main question too? :D |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:09 |
hmic |
maybe provide an example array in the code comment to make it clear: [Articles.Comments] |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:08 |
Junior |
n the end i have submitted an issue for the footprint plugin. Blocks of code available at: https://github.com/UseMuffin/Footprint/issues/46 . If anyone has any idea, please share it with me! |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:07 |
dereuromark |
thats what I thought |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:07 |
hmic |
it can be a deep save, use . notation |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:07 |
hmic |
true is only a shortcut for saving up one level |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:07 |
technofection |
Yes, it can be array, but upto 1 level |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:07 |
hmic |
you can save deep with this |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:06 |
hmic |
arrays take . notation |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:06 |
hmic |
ah, it's right there, you can pass arrays too |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:06 |
hmic |
you can pass arrays to associated too IMHO |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:05 |
technofection |
associated: If true it will save 1st level associated entities as they are found in the passed $entity whenever the property defined for the association is marked as dirty. If an array, it will be interpreted as the list of associations to be saved. It is possible to provide different options for saving on associated table objects using this key by making the custom options the array value. If false no associated records will be saved. |
| # |
Apr 21st 2017, 10:04 |
technofection |
https://api.cakephp.org/3.3/class-Cake.ORM.Table.html |