| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 12:10 |
 ndm |
http://book.cakephp.org/3.0/en/development/routing.html#passing-parameters-to-action |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 12:10 |
ndm |
@aneh You must mark the `cat` element as to be passed, ie in the routes options `'pass' => ['cat']` |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 12:08 |
flangofas |
http://book.cakephp.org/3.0/en/views/helpers/paginator.html#creating-jump-links |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 11:59 |
aneh |
Hi, i need a your help with pagination plz check my qus on stackoverflow: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/39871520/cakephp-3-custom-route-in-pagination thanks thanks |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 11:20 |
francky06l |
ypnos: yes like linux tab .. easy ! |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 11:18 |
ypnos |
idk, press y<tab>? ;) |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 11:17 |
francky06l |
ypnos: thanks I am back on it ..( Damn I do not remember the IRC shortcut for putting your name in from of the message) :) |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 11:13 |
bhaskartripathi |
Thanks @yonos |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 11:13 |
ypnos |
bhaskartripathi: the ORM layer basically needs to be redone in any case |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 11:12 |
ypnos |
bhaskartripathi: it depends on the code and design quality of your old code. mine was so bad that I gave up on migration and restarted from scratch |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 11:12 |
ypnos |
francky06l: as in the main model you can unset the related elements... as in my example code |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 11:11 |
ypnos |
francky06l: I had said you have to do this in the users/clients model.. NOT in the associated model :) |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 11:11 |
birdy247 |
Super sweet exception :) |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 11:11 |
bhaskartripathi |
which approach is best 1. migration 2. start from scratch in cakephp3 |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 11:11 |
birdy247 |
The afterSave event in "App\Model\Table\RatesTimesheetsTable" is aborting the transaction before the save process is done. |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 11:10 |
ypnos |
great bhaskartripathi |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 11:09 |
bhaskartripathi |
hi, my website is in cakephp2 and i want to upgrade it to cakephp3 |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 11:06 |
maikh |
dumbass |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 11:06 |
maikh |
ok... found my fault... :P |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 11:02 |
maikh |
no, dont works... |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 10:59 |
maikh |
ok, i did a copy of the correct working rules... now it works... hm... |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 10:57 |
maikh |
hm, i dont can see a typo |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 10:55 |
hmic |
you obviously missed something, i've already mentioned a typo as this would be the first random error |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 10:53 |
maikh |
thats strange for me. |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 10:53 |
maikh |
yes, i know. but i dont understand why it works on the one field but not on the other field. |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 10:52 |
hmic |
still the wrong approach to the requrirement |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 10:51 |
maikh |
i did it because my customer dont wants datepickers, only inputs for that. |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 10:51 |
maikh |
jep |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 10:51 |
hmic |
so cake does not even know they are date fields? :p |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 10:51 |
maikh |
these fields are bothe declared as varchar fields in db. |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 10:49 |
hmic |
maikh: whats the database for those two fields? if the code is identical - no typos :p, the database can still be a point - like a NULL vs. NOT NULL field |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 10:46 |
maikh |
has anyone a hint on this for me? |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 10:44 |
slackebot |
date which is not in future the validator returns false on futureDate. -> works like excepted now i want the same behaivour on date_from. code is the same, but behaivour is an other. |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 10:44 |
slackebot |
der Zukunft liegt.' ] ]) ->add('date_from', [ 'date' => [ 'rule' => ['date', ['dmy']], 'message' => 'Bitte gültiges Datum eingeben.', 'last' => true, ], 'futureDate' => [ 'rule' => [$this, 'futureDate'], 'message' => 'Bitte geben Sie ein Datum ein was in der Zukunft liegt.' ] ])``` on the appointment, this works very well. if i type a value like ```aaa``` the validator returns false on date validator |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 10:44 |
maikh |
hey there. i come today with a little validation problem :slightly_smiling_face: i have to fields which i want to validate. first i want it is a date and after that i want the date is in future ``` ->add('appointment', [ 'date' => [ 'rule' => ['date', ['dmy']], 'message' => 'Bitte gültiges Datum eingeben.', 'last' => true, ],'futureDate' => [ 'rule' => [$this, 'futureDate'], 'message' => 'Bitte geben Sie ein D |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 10:42 |
dereuromark |
You are right. Can be removed |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 10:41 |
ndm |
@dereuromark Do you really actually need the `id`, ie is your code dependent on it? And if it is, wich `id` would be the "correct" one if you have multiple rows in the group? I don't know what your code does, but I could imagine that relying on one of the the id(s) of a group indicates that something is wrong here. |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 10:39 |
acosonic |
XML actually :) works good |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 10:37 |
kennydang |
as i'm sending an array |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 10:37 |
hmic |
in cake, use debugkit "history" to show your ajax requests |
| # |
Oct 6th 2016, 10:37 |
kennydang |
so my data is undefined? |