Log message #3942985

# At Username Text
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:47 dereuromark lorenzo Did you have a change to look into the postgres issue, didnt see if you replied already. It works for Mysql so far just fine.
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:45 Unfaiir I checked out the migration guide a bit, I didn't see anything about the webroot, I guess I missed it
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:42 dereuromark Unfaiir: You can also look into existing apps and plugins, see the awesome list
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:42 lorenzo that explains some of the bigger changes
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:42 lorenzo Unfaiir did you read the migration guide?
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:41 lorenzo ok
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:41 keith Thanks @dereuromark Iâ??ll look into it
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:41 Unfaiir lorenzo: I'm on 2.x still, just tyring to understand the folder changes in 3.x
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:39 dereuromark keith: my tools plugin provides tokens which I use for this
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:33 lorenzo bu what are you looking at?
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:33 lorenzo the webroot is now outside `src`
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:33 Unfaiir lorenzo: Inside the src folder I don't see the webroot folder, where has that gone?
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:32 keith 3.3.5
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:32 keith Is anyone aware of a forgotten password plugin for 3.5?
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:30 lorenzo it is called `src` now
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:30 Unfaiir Where is the app folder in 3.x?
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:28 lorenzo Greezler how are you building the prepared statement?
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:26 francky06l ypnos: seem no way to 'delete the object' .. I can force validate => false in the options .. but that will not avoid the Entity creation
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:20 francky06l ypnos sorry it is triggerd
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:15 francky06l ypnos: beforeMarshal of the associated models are not called I think, I have to do this in the main model ..right ?
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:14 Greezler Is there a reliable way I can use a PHP array (of integers) as a condition in a prepared statement?
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:01 ypnos you're welcome
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:01 francky06l I will give a try, Thanks a lot
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:01 francky06l I see, it's the "beforeValidate" of 2.x something like this ..
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:00 ypnos instead of properties you would have addresses
# Oct 5th 2016, 17:00 ypnos this would go into the User/Client table class
# Oct 5th 2016, 16:59 ypnos this is what I do in a similar problem
# Oct 5th 2016, 16:59 ypnos francky06l: https://gist.github.com/ypnos-web/af1f88fa18c148113cd4a88e495bb331
# Oct 5th 2016, 16:59 francky06l ~help
# Oct 5th 2016, 16:59 francky06l ~
# Oct 5th 2016, 16:59 francky06l ok, super :_)
# Oct 5th 2016, 16:58 ypnos francky06l: I have some example code for you
# Oct 5th 2016, 16:58 ypnos but for this you would need to do 2x hasOne instead of one hasMany
# Oct 5th 2016, 16:57 ypnos the other can be that you set a custom validator for the second association
# Oct 5th 2016, 16:57 ypnos that is probably the best solution to your problem
# Oct 5th 2016, 16:57 ypnos so you could throw out the second address in the request data if it is blank
# Oct 5th 2016, 16:57 francky06l I know :-) First it contains errors for the second address (wich is blank) ...
# Oct 5th 2016, 16:57 ypnos but you can work on the data before validation
# Oct 5th 2016, 16:56 ypnos no I just mention that this is what the validation is doing
# Oct 5th 2016, 16:56 francky06l So you suggest I should work on the request->data prior to "Entitize" them
# Oct 5th 2016, 16:55 ypnos I assume is your concern is that a second, associated address entity would be created even if not necessary