| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 15:22 |
 birdy247 |
This might be an easy answer |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 15:22 |
birdy247 |
Neon1024 |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 15:20 |
str |
$user->unset('partner')->save(); or just the unset? |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 15:20 |
Neon1024 |
$user->unset(â??partnerâ??) |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 15:20 |
Neon1024 |
Of it one is set |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 15:20 |
Neon1024 |
Donâ??t assign a Partner entity to the User entity |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 15:19 |
str |
If I have Users BelongsToMany Partners. and I wnat to remove the link for a specific user and leave that user with no partner, how do I do that? |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 15:18 |
str |
Hi! |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 15:09 |
Neon1024 |
In some cases but only if I felt it was relevant. I donâ??t think there is a hard and fast rule though |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:59 |
djbuss |
would you use load model instead ? |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:59 |
Neon1024 |
Perhaps I should be calling a method instead |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:58 |
Neon1024 |
If youâ??ve got that many though, Iâ??d stop and think, why am I traversing so many models |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:58 |
Neon1024 |
Nope |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:58 |
djbuss |
Do you guys see a problem in using models chained ? like $this->ModelA->ModelB->ModelC->find(â??allâ??) |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:52 |
Neon1024 |
Too cynical to trust my brain! |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:52 |
Neon1024 |
No idea why I think that though |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:52 |
Neon1024 |
As I think with cascade it should go through each related item one at a time in the related table class |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:52 |
Neon1024 |
Put it in both tables though |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:51 |
birdy247 |
:+1: |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:48 |
Neon1024 |
Just put afterDelete() with parent::afterDelete; and exit() everywhere, see what works |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:48 |
birdy247 |
If only we could be in the same room lol |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:48 |
birdy247 |
I am not expalining very well |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:48 |
birdy247 |
no probs |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:48 |
Neon1024 |
Had a hectic week this week |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:48 |
Neon1024 |
Sorry I canâ??t be more help, on a bit of a deadline today |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:45 |
Neon1024 |
Iâ??d have left the behaviour alone and bound a listener to the event myself |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:44 |
Neon1024 |
Both table classes. |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:44 |
birdy247 |
in the table class |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:44 |
birdy247 |
:slightly_smiling_face: |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:44 |
birdy247 |
instead, I have my own |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:44 |
Neon1024 |
ACTION jumps in the sea |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:44 |
Neon1024 |
Then Iâ??m lost |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:44 |
birdy247 |
I have configured it so it doesnt |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:44 |
Neon1024 |
So youâ??ve diabled that functionality, and then say that it doesnâ??t work |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:44 |
Neon1024 |
The behaviour uses beforeDelete to trash items |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:44 |
birdy247 |
because I have disabled the beforeDelete |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:43 |
birdy247 |
is that what you mean? |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:43 |
birdy247 |
$event->stopPropogation() |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:42 |
Neon1024 |
Thatâ??s like saying you canâ??t drive your car because youâ??ve taken the wheels off |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:42 |
Neon1024 |
If youâ??ve removed the event if uses, then no, it won't |
| # |
Sep 30th 2016, 14:42 |
birdy247 |
when using this behaviour |