| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:59 |
ionas |
you probably want inner join |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:59 |
ionas |
Sonu_nk: you donâ??t want contain |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:59 |
 spriz |
does anyone have had success with CakePdf (DomPDF) in terms of â??page number / total page numbersâ? like page "1 of 3" |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:58 |
ionas |
however Iâ??d be careful and possibly rather use components and stuff |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:58 |
ionas |
conehead you should be able to by namespaces and stuff to overwrite a core controller from a plugin |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:51 |
frzrr |
is there any way to set saveStrategy @ runtime ? |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:46 |
birdy247 |
so in this case, null = "do more checks, no hard or fast yes or no" |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:45 |
JohnWayne |
@birdy247 you can exclude that line (we use this in our project cos we are working with API/REST and cakephp queries together |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:45 |
birdy247 |
is it ok to return null from a function |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:43 |
frzrr |
having some issues when trying to add multiple rows with same ids in the pivot table. sometimes i do want to add records with duplicate ids, but different references as extra joindata. It fails and i always get the last patched entity in the jointable. Whats the option that lets you add multiple records with same ids? |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:42 |
birdy247 |
calling parent at the end is too late in this case |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:42 |
birdy247 |
$this->loadComponent('Paginator'); why is this in the isAuthorized? |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:42 |
birdy247 |
JohnWayne |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:41 |
JohnWayne |
@birdy247 http://pastebin.com/0ghicF4v |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:40 |
JohnWayne |
AppController::_getUserType($this->Auth->user('id')) |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:40 |
birdy247 |
perhaps I should return something other than true or false from the parent? |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:39 |
birdy247 |
so putting return parent::... at the top of the isAuthorized in my controller could be wrong? |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:39 |
birdy247 |
so a user might be an ORGANISER, but I still want to perform more checks to see if they are authorized |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:37 |
birdy247 |
parent::isAuthorized($user) |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:37 |
birdy247 |
the only bit I cant get my head around, is how should I then call this in the controller |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:36 |
unorthodox |
Thats correct @birdy247 |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:36 |
JohnWayne |
Me too |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:35 |
birdy247 |
I though about doing it in the AppController isAuthorized function |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:35 |
JohnWayne |
always use Cakephp Conventions (code is more readable than) |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:35 |
birdy247 |
is there any easy way to prevent users without a given role to view any of a given prefix |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:35 |
birdy247 |
if using prefixed routes |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:35 |
JohnWayne |
http://pastebin.com/F0jFmusa |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:32 |
JohnWayne |
use find('all'), delete select() |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:22 |
Sonu_nk |
hi, when i am adding where with contain , i am getting this issue " Unknowun coloum : FaqHeaders.header in where clause" . here is my code.: pastebin.com/ZiNTyGSk |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:21 |
cakephp595 |
hi, when i am adding where with contain , i am getting this issue " Unknowun coloum : FaqHeaders.header in where clause" . here is my code.: pastebin.com/ZiNTyGSk |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:18 |
conehead |
Hey guys. Was wondering overall, if it is possible to override / extend single controllers with plugins. I got a project which several people use and some might need extra functions for specific controllers. Is there an easy way? |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:10 |
ionas |
if any of you still wants to grab a bite I am leaving my appartement soon @ amsterdam |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:09 |
ionas |
all the best to you guys |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:09 |
ionas |
client javascript based - application password_hash based - then on the fly salts for the database but still based on password_hash :) |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:09 |
ionas |
you could - I think - still use password hash two times ;) |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:08 |
hmic |
as i said, there might be cases you might think and might want to do better - feel free to. |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:07 |
ionas |
yeah but security may assume bad code ;p |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:07 |
hmic |
*if* thats the case, you have serious problems anyways |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:07 |
ionas |
client salt+hash, application salt + hash, db field salt + hash ;) |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:07 |
hmic |
that helps only if an attacker can overwrite passwords of other users by known (hashed) values |
| # |
May 30th 2016, 09:06 |
hmic |
ionas, its just not neccessary |