Log message #3882787

# At Username Text
# May 30th 2016, 07:31 voycey no probs man - much appreciated - just wanted to make sure i wasnt re-inventing the wheel
# May 30th 2016, 07:31 bravo-kernel ;)
# May 30th 2016, 07:31 bravo-kernel maybe someone else has a brilliant idea
# May 30th 2016, 07:31 voycey I can handle it with multiple tokens
# May 30th 2016, 07:31 bravo-kernel and gotta run
# May 30th 2016, 07:30 bravo-kernel well, I don't know about that
# May 30th 2016, 07:30 voycey one SDK might handle multiple apps above it
# May 30th 2016, 07:30 voycey not possible really - the logins are handled through an SDK
# May 30th 2016, 07:30 bravo-kernel banking apps do exactly the same
# May 30th 2016, 07:30 bravo-kernel just ask for password again?
# May 30th 2016, 07:29 voycey yeah me too - so I guess id have to store some other kind of token to handle the re-request
# May 30th 2016, 07:29 bravo-kernel but that's personal
# May 30th 2016, 07:29 bravo-kernel and auto-refreshing would mean storing username/password locally which is horrid if you ask me
# May 30th 2016, 07:29 bravo-kernel not authenticated anymore means re-authenticating to me
# May 30th 2016, 07:28 bravo-kernel nope
# May 30th 2016, 07:28 voycey or is there some other mechanism thats recommended to do it?
# May 30th 2016, 07:28 voycey yeah so can that expired token be used to request a new one?
# May 30th 2016, 07:27 bravo-kernel that's the whole point
# May 30th 2016, 07:27 bravo-kernel the app should only store the (user-specific) token, not the password
# May 30th 2016, 07:27 voycey logging in again isnt really an option so just wondering how other people build this
# May 30th 2016, 07:26 bravo-kernel s/one/a girl/
# May 30th 2016, 07:26 voycey say if it was an app that was issued with a token - would the app have to store the username and password in that case?
# May 30th 2016, 07:26 bravo-kernel one may request as often as one likes
# May 30th 2016, 07:26 bravo-kernel just request a new token
# May 30th 2016, 07:25 voycey Refreshing *with a new token
# May 30th 2016, 07:25 voycey not revocation really but more like refreshing a new token
# May 30th 2016, 07:25 bravo-kernel replacements sounds like revocation and jwt was/is not meant for that
# May 30th 2016, 07:24 voycey ok I thought so - but I had a quick read around and there were all sorts of options about using another token to get a replacement
# May 30th 2016, 07:24 bravo-kernel then get a new token by using `/token` action
# May 30th 2016, 07:24 bravo-kernel jwt just throws an expired exception
# May 30th 2016, 07:23 bravo-kernel and for a reason
# May 30th 2016, 07:23 bravo-kernel no
# May 30th 2016, 07:23 voycey do you have anything on your amazing JWT tutorials about handling expired tokens?
# May 30th 2016, 07:23 voycey bravo-kernel
# May 30th 2016, 07:22 bravo-kernel pretty good result for the 1st release, I hope feedback will result in updates
# May 30th 2016, 07:21 bravo-kernel @savant: nice work on the new look n feel
# May 30th 2016, 07:18 Liquidedust remind me to take a day off after next cakeFest, was quite rough to go to work this morning
# May 30th 2016, 07:17 unorthodox Morning @Liquidedust
# May 30th 2016, 07:15 Liquidedust ACTION yawns
# May 30th 2016, 07:09 storkovo sooner. Thats cool, good to have you here.
# May 30th 2016, 07:08 voycey 2006 ish? 2007 maybe?