| # |
May 27th 2016, 13:13 |
icyrizard |
Ah ok thanks for the info, I'll do that :) |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 13:08 |
d0rxy |
ah, ok I'll check out the request handler! :) |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 13:08 |
 markstory |
which is more likely |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 13:08 |
markstory |
Or we were relying on the bug :slightly_smiling_face: |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 13:07 |
markstory |
d0rxy: sounds like it might be a regression. A small part of RequestHandler was changed in 3.2.10 |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 13:06 |
markstory |
icyrizard: A pull request for the readme would be great |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 13:03 |
icyrizard |
The other is a 'missing database' issue, where you just need to switch to Sqlite in database.php |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 13:02 |
icyrizard |
First problem is the AutoLoad missing, which is fixed by running: composer global require "phpunit/phpunit=3.7.*" (or whatever version you need). |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 13:00 |
icyrizard |
Hi guys, I am adding tests for pull request #8844 and ran into some issues related to running the tests. There is really some information missing about on how to run them. Shall I create a pull request to update the readme? |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 12:35 |
d0rxy |
(if I update that other previously working instance to cakephp 3.2.10 it also fails) |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 12:33 |
d0rxy |
can anyone point me in the right direction where to debug? I also have an instance where it is working but I can not figure out where the difference lies |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 12:33 |
d0rxy |
it gives me this error message: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/38444c09069de57d2b06d471ab08d2e2 |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 12:32 |
d0rxy |
Whenever I click a previous request in the history panel it gives an error500, as if it doesn't know it needs to produce json... |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 12:31 |
d0rxy |
I don't know if it's the upgrade to cakephp 3.2.10 I did today or something else I messed up in my code but it just occurred today |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 12:31 |
d0rxy |
hi all! I'm having an issue with debug kit... :( |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 12:18 |
bernat1 |
Which transaction isolation level does CakePHP uses or expects in the database? When using tables with multi-column primary keys it checks if it exists then inserts or updates. I guess this needs the serializable level to work. |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 12:12 |
johnW_ |
sry that was not for you... :( |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 12:03 |
mesterjagel |
http://book.cakephp.org/3.0/en/core-libraries/time.html#creating-time-instances |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 12:02 |
mesterjagel |
@johnW Iâ??m not sure there is a global function for that. You could make a component with a function that translates your DB timestamp into a localised one, and then include that component whenever you need to translate a timestamp:) |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 11:57 |
johnW_ |
and you call your function every time or it is somewhere "global" |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 11:56 |
mesterjagel |
I get a â??Nicelyâ?? formatted string rather than numbers, anyone know why? |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 11:56 |
mesterjagel |
$month = $query->func()->date_format([ 'created' => 'identifier', "'%Y:%M:%D'" => 'literal' ]); |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 11:56 |
mesterjagel |
Hi guys:) Iâ??m using the date_format function from the ORM to group some entries like this: |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 11:52 |
johnW_ |
now we are using something like this -> $user->created->nice('Europe/Paris') |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 11:51 |
johnW_ |
is there option in cakephp3 that I can always read data in UTC+2 time and when I write data or edit that is always in UTC-0 saved in DB? Not manual for each date/time... something global... thx |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 11:47 |
Neon1024x |
https://github.com/lorenzo/cakephp3-examples/blob/master/config/Schema/world.sql |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 11:47 |
sab-cakefest |
Thanks Neon1024! |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 11:45 |
Neon1024x |
sab-cakefest, Here is the link to the belongsToMany Through option, http://book.cakephp.org/3.0/en/orm/associations.html#using-the-through-option |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 11:44 |
elboletaire |
After what we've discussed, I'm not gonna use View Cells. As you previously said it's a good replacement for the old `requestAction` method, so... moving the logic to the tables should be my main priority now x__D |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 11:37 |
bernat1 |
Or do you want to write blocks in the view cell and read them in the main view? I think that would be awful to do with view cells. |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 11:35 |
bernat1 |
@elboletaire, do you really need to pass the main view? Can't you just pass the blocks? I think it would make sense passing just what the cell needs. You'd have a more reusable view cell. |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 11:32 |
unorthodox |
Gah, requestAction. |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 11:31 |
bernat1 |
@elboletaire, view cells is a new feature in 3.0, we have lived long without them and I don't use them. It can replace the old requestAction method that some people needed, not me. They help reuse controller actions from views. |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 11:30 |
elboletaire |
thanks @fquffio, it's a good example :slightly_smiling_face: |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 11:30 |
spriz |
I feel like Iâ??m missing something, I sure canâ??t be the first that wants to edit a bunch of objects at once? :P |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 11:29 |
spriz |
Am I doing something stupid when implementing a â??bulk editâ? Crud Action? |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 11:27 |
fquffio |
@elboletaire: for instance, I wanted to show the amount of tickets assigned to the logged user on every page. This required a small amount of logic to be executed, but that had nothing to do with the current controller/action, and especially I didn't want that logic to be executed if I wasn't rendering the view (APIs), so I used view cells. :) |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 11:21 |
elboletaire |
Then... what would be a good reason to use a view cell? Now I don't get how could I use them xD |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 10:59 |
bernat1 |
I misunderstood, hehe. :) |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 10:59 |
unorthodox |
Fat Models, Skinny Controllers |
| # |
May 27th 2016, 10:59 |
bernat1 |
ah, ok, sorry. :-/ |