| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:31 |
BackEndCoder |
you are saving the joining table |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:31 |
BackEndCoder |
what you are doing isn't saving habtm |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:31 |
todds |
The way that convo progressed made me think of itâ?¦ had to share. :) |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:31 |
BackEndCoder |
chris______, |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:30 |
BackEndCoder |
todds, damn them and thier jokes :D |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:29 |
chris______ |
thats what I want to do |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:29 |
chris______ |
1 | 3 |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:29 |
chris______ |
1 | 2 |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:29 |
chris______ |
1 | 1 |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:29 |
chris______ |
order_id | item_id |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:29 |
chris______ |
the relationship table would have rows like this: |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:29 |
chris______ |
Since I am creating Order with ID = 1, and that order contains Items with IDs: 1, 2, 3 and 4; |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:28 |
todds |
sorry, I can't offer any help, but i gotta share: http://xkcd.com/1323/ |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:28 |
chris______ |
so your relationship table (N:M) would have IDs for both Order and Items, right? |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:28 |
the-neon |
yeah |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:27 |
chris______ |
ok lets suppose you have an Order, and in that Order you have Items, right? |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:25 |
the-neon |
perhaps I'm a bit confused by my own assoc issue but I can't follow -_- |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:23 |
chris______ |
quotation 1, product 1; quotation 1, product 2; quotation 1, product 3 |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:23 |
the-neon |
1-2? |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:22 |
chris______ |
that's what I want to do |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:22 |
chris______ |
? |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:22 |
chris______ |
cant i have rows like 1-2, 1-3, 1-4 |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:22 |
chris______ |
but |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:22 |
chris______ |
i see |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:14 |
todds |
verbose correction |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:12 |
the-neon |
now... is it possible to use one action for a HasManyThrough add/save? Possible/Correct? |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:08 |
TeckniX |
chris______: doesn't look like it's deleting anything - You're passing an ID for each, so it's just over-writing the previous data at the ID found |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:08 |
the-neon |
that's what you need 99% |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:08 |
the-neon |
chris____ open the book and on model associations read about 'unique' |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:08 |
the-neon |
lol |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:07 |
TeckniX |
(s/like/lie/) correction: Don't lie bot.. |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:07 |
TeckniX |
Don't like bot.. |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:07 |
chris______ |
i set nothing. All I did was <pre>public $hasAndBelongsToMany = 'Product';</pre> on Quotation and viceversa |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:06 |
TeckniX |
!seen dereuromark |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:05 |
the-neon |
in your HABTM declaration what have you set for 'unique' ? |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:04 |
the-neon |
can you pastebin your model? |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:02 |
chris______ |
the problem I'm having is that before inserting a new row in the relationship table, it deletes the previous one |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 19:02 |
chris______ |
Hello, I'm having issues saving HABTM data. Here's the debug() of the array http://bin.cakephp.org/view/1341935031 |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 18:40 |
NetersLandreau |
probably not.. it's just a habit of mine |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 18:36 |
jhughes |
NetersLandreau: thanks but I just realized that it just won't display if debug level is 0 (production) so I don't think this is an issue. Is loading the debug kit resource intensive? Is it worth to load it conditionally? |
| # |
Jan 30th 2014, 18:35 |
NetersLandreau |
jhughes: this may work for - http://bin.cakephp.org/view/12966909 |