# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:14 |
dogmatic69 |
yep |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:14 |
dakota |
ah, like most of his code |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:14 |
dogmatic69 |
savants filter plugin... |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:13 |
dakota |
dogmatic69: ? |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:13 |
dakota |
ujjain: that's the one I was talking about. |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:13 |
dogmatic69 |
"THIS IS BROKEN DO NOT USE" |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:13 |
ujjain |
hmm, I also found https://github.com/CakeDC/search |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:13 |
dogmatic69 |
the description is pretty good... |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:13 |
ujjain |
dakota: hehe, not worth it for 5 sites with 100-1000 visitors. |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:13 |
dogmatic69 |
https://github.com/josegonzalez/cakephp-filter-plugin |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:12 |
dakota |
ujjain: or use sphinx or lucene :) |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:12 |
dogmatic69 |
ujjain: savants filter plugin is good |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:12 |
ujjain |
Yeah. |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:12 |
dakota |
ujjain: last update for searchable was june 2009 |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:11 |
ujjain |
dakota: I want to have a search feature that I can easily implement in multiple sites, without much head ache. |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:11 |
dakota |
ujjain: iirc, the searchable behaviour is very out of date |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:11 |
dogmatic69 |
o/ |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:11 |
dakota |
sup dogmatic69 |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:11 |
dogmatic69 |
ACTION pokes dakota |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:11 |
dakota |
the searchable behaviour is for searching your app |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:11 |
dakota |
ujjain: Ah, I remember that one from ages ago. Well, it depends. what do you want to do? The cakedc one is more for filtering a single model based |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:10 |
ujjain |
https://code.google.com/p/searchable-behaviour-for-cakephp/ |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:10 |
dakota |
google code one? |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:10 |
ujjain |
is the cake dc one better? |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:10 |
ujjain |
dakota: the google code one... |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:09 |
dakota |
ujjain: the CakeDC one? |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 10:08 |
ujjain |
Is the searachable behaviour good? |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 09:49 |
dogmatic69 |
!tell Section58 about bin |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 09:49 |
Section58 |
er wtf |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 09:48 |
Section58 |
SELECT `Artist`.`id`, `Artist`.`name`, `Artist`.`slug`, `Artist`.`bio`, `Artist`.`created`, `Artist`.`modified`, `Artist`.`country_id`, `ArtistsEvent`.`id`, `ArtistsEvent`.`artist_id`, `ArtistsEvent`.`event_id` FROM `guestlist_artists` AS `Artist` JOIN `guestlist_artists_events` AS `ArtistsEvent` ON (`ArtistsEvent`.`event_id` IN (3295, 3532, 3412, 3358, 3294, 3273, 3293, 3528, 3529, 3530, 3163, 3275, 3324, 3472, 3526, 3271, 3356, 3527, 3346, 3344, 3162, 352 |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 09:46 |
diverdude |
sorry...my mistake |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 09:46 |
dogmatic69 |
yep |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 09:46 |
diverdude |
it should be singular |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 09:46 |
diverdude |
sorry man |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 09:46 |
diverdude |
ahh yes |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 09:46 |
dogmatic69 |
read it |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 09:46 |
dogmatic69 |
!conventions |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 09:46 |
dogmatic69 |
no |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 09:45 |
diverdude |
thats odd...in my database table profile the FK is called childrenstatuses_id ... which should be ok? |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 09:44 |
dogmatic69 |
pr(array_keys((array)$this>Profile)); |
# |
Sep 22nd 2011, 09:44 |
dogmatic69 |
can you see the *ES* at the end? |