| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:05 |
Section58 |
so lets say you have a multitree behavoir, with a higharcial structure with a table called root_id .... that will break it |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:05 |
diverdude |
true...just is hacky...if i need to re-cake i have to do it over again |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:05 |
Section58 |
*bake will |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:05 |
Section58 |
bake with mash it as it sees it |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:05 |
Section58 |
bake doesn't make the whole thing, and if your naming conventions are slightly wrong |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:04 |
Section58 |
then add on the specials a the end |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:04 |
Section58 |
you could build all of it |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:04 |
Section58 |
if you deleted the table that errored |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:04 |
Section58 |
but logically |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:04 |
Section58 |
remmber that i don't use bake |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:04 |
diverdude |
Section58, but how can i then avoid it to be process by all? |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:03 |
Section58 |
it will not |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:03 |
Section58 |
no |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:03 |
diverdude |
Section58, so if i generate cake_sessions manually first it will be skipped when i do all afterwards? |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:02 |
Section58 |
as they are not special like cake_sessions |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:02 |
Section58 |
may or maynot handle the 'all' pram |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:02 |
Section58 |
the other tables |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:02 |
Section58 |
and you can make the x at that point |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:02 |
diverdude |
thats a huge task for 63 tables |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:02 |
Section58 |
pick the cake_session model (it should list it) |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:02 |
diverdude |
Section58, that means one by one |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:02 |
Section58 |
and use the options |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:02 |
Section58 |
start with 'cake bake' |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:02 |
dakota |
diverdude: remove the cake_sessions table temporarily then |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:01 |
diverdude |
Section58, what kind of bits? |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:01 |
Section58 |
do it in bits |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:01 |
diverdude |
i need to do this automatically |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:01 |
Section58 |
diverdude: don't do it 'all' |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:01 |
diverdude |
i have 63 tables |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:01 |
Section58 |
'why does it make a controller'[C |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:01 |
dakota |
diverdude: don't use bake |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:01 |
Section58 |
lol |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:01 |
diverdude |
sorry, cake bake controller all |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:01 |
Section58 |
cause your making it bake it all |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:00 |
diverdude |
dakota, i dont but it generates one automatically when i run cake bake all controller |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:00 |
Section58 |
yeah tbh the core should have a invult one for sessions |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:00 |
dakota |
diverdude: you can't have any classes that use the same name as other classes. |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 07:00 |
dakota |
diverdude: you need to create a table called cake_sessions. Why do you need a controller/model though? |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 06:59 |
diverdude |
dakota, ok? hmmm but i thought i had to create a table named that for using cake sessions |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 06:59 |
dakota |
diverdude: you're gonna need to name it something other than CakeSession |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2011, 06:59 |
dakota |
ACTION smells coffee |