# |
May 21st 2010, 15:16 |
wedlink |
ok.. i am out |
# |
May 21st 2010, 15:16 |
savant |
sokay :) |
# |
May 21st 2010, 15:16 |
ADmad |
well then be patient and ask again after sometime. This is not the channel for general cakephp help |
# |
May 21st 2010, 15:16 |
wedlink |
I am sorry.. |
# |
May 21st 2010, 15:16 |
savant |
you left the room before I could answer ;) |
# |
May 21st 2010, 15:15 |
wedlink |
I asked over there and no one answered.. but ok.. thanks.. |
# |
May 21st 2010, 15:15 |
ADmad |
* #cakephp |
# |
May 21st 2010, 15:15 |
ADmad |
wedlink: wrong channel. ask in #cakphp. (you need a registered nick to talk in there) |
# |
May 21st 2010, 15:13 |
wedlink |
hello, I just have a quick , question.. I just updated to the latest stable version of cake, and now it is asking me to name my behavior classes "nameBehaviorBehavior" in a file "name_behavior.php", has anyone else notice this?? |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:22 |
savant |
adios |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:22 |
Guest91223 |
ok gotta run, laters |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:22 |
Guest91223 |
even though zend is finally going that way in the next major release |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:21 |
Guest91223 |
but I must admit, cake's db abstraction is more advanced that zend |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:21 |
Guest91223 |
it is a MVC framework aswell as libs |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:21 |
Guest91223 |
it is hard to setup, but seems more appropriate for large scale apps |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:21 |
savant |
regardless, cakephp has done me well |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:21 |
savant |
i needed a framework, not a bunch of libraries |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:20 |
savant |
yeah i used zend once. i didn't like it. |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:20 |
Guest91223 |
I started to use cake about 3 years ago and then after 6 months swittched to Zend, and have been using it since ;) |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:20 |
savant |
since a week after 1.2 stable |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:19 |
savant |
about a year or so |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:18 |
Guest91223 |
found them :) |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:18 |
Guest91223 |
and where are the test cases for the cake core files? |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:17 |
Guest91223 |
btw how long have you been using cake for? |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:17 |
Guest91223 |
I gotta run to work, but chat to you later on and/or over the weekend ;), we can discuss more :) |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:16 |
savant |
just saying :) |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:16 |
Guest91223 |
but thank you for your suggestion |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:16 |
Guest91223 |
that is too short sighted my friend |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:16 |
savant |
which right now is simpletest |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:16 |
Guest91223 |
which I cant get into now, but happy to discuss over the weeknd ;) |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:16 |
savant |
so test the cakephp way? |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:15 |
Guest91223 |
both have their pros and cons |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:15 |
Guest91223 |
but the project has already been started in cake |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:15 |
Guest91223 |
I would |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:15 |
savant |
) |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:15 |
savant |
might as well use Zend if you want Zend features |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:15 |
Guest91223 |
and depends how elegant it is too |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:15 |
Guest91223 |
if it works, then it could be contributed |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:14 |
savant |
unless you're going to contribute :) |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:14 |
Guest91223 |
well thats going a bit far ;), I bet you want me to go AOP too :p |
# |
May 21st 2010, 00:14 |
savant |
just because it is planned for the future does not mean it should be hacked in now |