| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:13 |
Guest91223 |
it shouldnt b |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:12 |
savant |
and if you have that mindset |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:12 |
savant |
to be honest, any method you device to stuff phpunit would be quite a hack |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:12 |
Guest91223 |
foresight is an amazing thing, we dont usually have it, but with this we do, so might as well make use of it ;) |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:12 |
Guest91223 |
now that we know it is moving, we should not need to migrate in the future, just start doing it that way from now |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:11 |
savant |
migrating test suites is not that big of a deal |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:11 |
Guest91223 |
(some how :s ) |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:11 |
Guest91223 |
I will get it work with phpunit |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:11 |
Guest91223 |
I wont be |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:11 |
Guest91223 |
the project will be ongoing for years |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:11 |
savant |
so then be testless? |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:11 |
Guest91223 |
even if in the next year |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:11 |
savant |
change in a year or two |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:11 |
Guest91223 |
even if it is not in the next 2 weeks |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:11 |
savant |
then test now |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:10 |
Guest91223 |
but it still silly to learn/spend time on somethign that is going to change |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:10 |
Guest91223 |
savant: I dont think simpletest is that bad, in some cases it is even better than phpunit |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:10 |
savant |
SimpleTest isn't that terrible |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:10 |
savant |
and you said you needed to test now |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:10 |
savant |
and i cannot imagine it's going to be released within the next two weeks |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:09 |
savant |
Guest91223: cakephp 1.3 and 2.0 will likely not be the simplest migration |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:08 |
Guest91223 |
2. if everything is going that way, it seems a waste to learn/use/integrate a redundant method/process |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:08 |
Guest91223 |
1. because I am more familiar with phpunit (I come from Zend Framework) |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:08 |
Guest91223 |
for 2 reasons: |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:05 |
Predominant |
Why can't you test with the builtin suite? |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:05 |
Guest91223 |
good idea, I can see how they are doing it |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:04 |
Guest91223 |
true, but I cant wait until then, I need to start testing sooner :( |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:04 |
Predominant |
You are welcome to follow those developments, and contribute where you can |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:04 |
Predominant |
Well, PHPUnit is happening in CakePHP 2.0 |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:04 |
Guest91223 |
Predominant: I cant be the first person who wants to do it? |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:04 |
Predominant |
ACTION nods. |
| # |
May 21st 2010, 00:04 |
Guest91223 |
Predominant: Thanks, I thought so, hence why i am asking how to do it |
| # |
May 20th 2010, 15:52 |
Predominant |
You would need to write your own testing suite to incorporate it. |
| # |
May 20th 2010, 15:52 |
Predominant |
Guest91223: CakePHP 1.x doesnt support PHPUnit |
| # |
May 20th 2010, 14:34 |
Guest91223 |
jose_zap: true, but it does not help me now ;) |
| # |
May 20th 2010, 13:58 |
jose_zap |
Guest91223: cake 2.0 will use phpunit |
| # |
May 20th 2010, 13:10 |
Guest91223 |
any pointers or links to tutorials/examples would be great :) |
| # |
May 20th 2010, 13:10 |
Guest91223 |
I have used phpunit before and know how to set it up, but not with cake |
| # |
May 20th 2010, 13:10 |
Guest91223 |
I am having some major issues setting it up |
| # |
May 20th 2010, 13:10 |
Guest91223 |
has anyone tried using phpunit with cakephp? |
| # |
May 20th 2010, 13:09 |
Guest91223 |
hi |