# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:53 |
savant |
a file seems to be missing from the currently deployed version (or a malfunctioning route, i cannot be sure) |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:52 |
savant |
before you leave, any place i should file a bug on cakeqs? |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:52 |
Predominant |
I'll leave you in the capable hands on PhpNut. |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:52 |
savant |
fair enough. again, my apologies. |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:52 |
Predominant |
Thats all. |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:52 |
Predominant |
Its the difference between co-operative communication to sort out a problem you have, and you being a rude bastard. |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:51 |
Predominant |
What you could have said previously is: it looks like the deployed version of the bakery differs from the source code thats available. Do i need to determine the differences myself, or is there an updates version I can get access to? |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:51 |
savant |
oh nvm, creole |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:51 |
savant |
does cakeqs use markdown for text input? |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:51 |
savant |
yeah… i'll try and keep my mouth shut on that from now on |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:51 |
Predominant |
You should research inner monologue. |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:50 |
Predominant |
Seems you can't help it. |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:50 |
savant |
sorry for sounding like an asshat |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:50 |
savant |
no im just speaking aloud |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:50 |
Predominant |
savant: Are you being a shithead for any particular reason? Or do you just want us to hate you? |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:46 |
savant |
how nice of the cakephp organization to provide me with an app to test against |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:45 |
savant |
oh thats nice, the current source of the application isn't what is actually deployed |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:42 |
PhpNut |
sure moment |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:42 |
savant |
can i have a db dump anyways? |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:42 |
PhpNut |
and the ones we have already planned |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:42 |
savant |
okay well |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:41 |
PhpNut |
the domains we use would be blocked |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:41 |
savant |
i'll want to register 'bin' as my username :) |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:40 |
savant |
then you have a potential domain name issue |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:40 |
savant |
savant.cakephp.org |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:40 |
savant |
do that, except /user/savant is better |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:40 |
PhpNut |
what is stupid? |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:40 |
PhpNut |
huh? |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:40 |
savant |
thats stupid |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:40 |
PhpNut |
or cakephp.org/dev/savant |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:40 |
savant |
dont do that |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:40 |
PhpNut |
but not sure if it will be something like savant.cakephp.org |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:39 |
PhpNut |
I mean we have the code @ cakedc for openid and oauth etc |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:39 |
PhpNut |
I am not sure how the openid side of it will work yet |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:39 |
PhpNut |
profiles for all developers etc will be listed there |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:39 |
PhpNut |
cakephp.org also |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:38 |
savant |
bin.cakephp.org |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:38 |
PhpNut |
eventually the complete 1 login system will tie every cakephp site together |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:37 |
savant |
if the only thing that is affected is user access |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:37 |
savant |
how would that plan affect a bakery rewrite |
# |
Apr 11th 2010, 22:37 |
PhpNut |
savant the plan is to integrate the bakery into the user system that cakeqs has and start allowing users to control content |