| # |
Apr 8th 2010, 07:07 |
laeeqrasheedahme |
but now, when i hover my mouse on page 2 again, the link i see in the status bar is |
| # |
Apr 8th 2010, 07:07 |
laeeqrasheedahme |
turns to www.abc.com/demo/Home/index/page:2 |
| # |
Apr 8th 2010, 07:07 |
laeeqrasheedahme |
when I click on page 2, it still shows me the same results i.e. what was on page 1. however the url in the address bar |
| # |
Apr 8th 2010, 07:07 |
laeeqrasheedahme |
www.abc.com/demo/Home/index/page:2 |
| # |
Apr 8th 2010, 07:07 |
laeeqrasheedahme |
When I hover my mouse on page number 2, the link it shows me in the status bar is something like this |
| # |
Apr 8th 2010, 07:07 |
laeeqrasheedahme |
I am currently on page 1 with address in the address bar as http://www.abc.com/demo/Home/index |
| # |
Apr 8th 2010, 07:07 |
laeeqrasheedahme |
I have got a question regarding cakephp pagination and routes. |
| # |
Apr 8th 2010, 07:07 |
laeeqrasheedahme |
Hello guys |
| # |
Apr 7th 2010, 11:47 |
hiromicahn |
jose_zap: thank you :) |
| # |
Apr 7th 2010, 11:47 |
jose_zap |
hiromicahn: is published now |
| # |
Apr 7th 2010, 11:47 |
hiromicahn |
jose_zap: yes |
| # |
Apr 7th 2010, 11:45 |
jose_zap |
hiromicahn: was the tmp folder writable? |
| # |
Apr 7th 2010, 11:43 |
hiromicahn |
unfortunately i cannot use APC beacause of my pc system is bit broken |
| # |
Apr 7th 2010, 11:42 |
hiromicahn |
new article is always be reviewed and be reviewd by manager of bakery? |
| # |
Apr 7th 2010, 11:42 |
jose_zap |
hiromicahn: could you please repeat your benchmarck adding APC? |
| # |
Apr 7th 2010, 11:40 |
jose_zap |
hiromicahn: I'm reviewing it |
| # |
Apr 7th 2010, 11:24 |
hiromicahn |
hi, i am trying to post new article to the bakery. i edited it as draft and now i edit it as no draft. it will be published? |
| # |
Mar 30th 2010, 14:27 |
ADmad |
y@m@h@3852cbz |
| # |
Mar 26th 2010, 17:10 |
Predominant |
Who is working on the bakery lately |
| # |
Mar 25th 2010, 13:12 |
pinoooh |
sorry, wrong channel |
| # |
Mar 25th 2010, 13:08 |
jose_zap |
pinoooh: ? |
| # |
Mar 25th 2010, 13:07 |
pinoooh |
? |
| # |
Mar 25th 2010, 05:53 |
danielle923 |
anyone here? |
| # |
Mar 16th 2010, 23:13 |
newbiee1 |
when i do cake bake it says unable to set cake_core_include_path |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:48 |
ADmad |
np |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:48 |
Iiridayn |
ADmad: thank you |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:48 |
ADmad |
Iiridayn: published |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:44 |
Iiridayn |
Sorry, would that do it? |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:37 |
ADmad |
and please add this link to the book http://book.cakephp.org/view/1608/Virtual-fields |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:36 |
ADmad |
dont want anyone using 1.3 to waste time reading through it only to realize there's already a better way in 1.3 :) |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:36 |
ADmad |
put the note at the top please.. |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:35 |
ADmad |
i still dont see the note like i mentioned above :) |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:35 |
Iiridayn |
kk, changed |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:32 |
ADmad |
Iiridayn: also please change title to "Sorting on aggregate and composite fields using pagination in 1.2" |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:31 |
ADmad |
yup 1.3 is very near stable release... anyways i can publish your article.. just add a note at the very top of you article that in 1.3 you should use the virtualFields features and following this trickery is not necessary |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:28 |
Iiridayn |
RC, anyway |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:28 |
Iiridayn |
I guess I'll have to give it some thought -- I'd love to make public the code, but see that it's not quite what you want on the bakery, since the 1.3 release. |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:26 |
ADmad |
thats sounds better, but the cookbook already has info regarding virtual fields usage.. |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:24 |
Iiridayn |
Hmm. What if I were to restructure it as a brief introduction to virtual fields, with a 1.2 fallback option? I won't be able to for a little while, but would that make it more useful? |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:21 |
ADmad |
*want people to |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:20 |
ADmad |
yeah but in 1.3 we now have virutalFields support which negates the use of any trickery :) and we want to upgrade |