| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:48 |
Iiridayn |
ADmad: thank you |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:48 |
ADmad |
Iiridayn: published |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:44 |
Iiridayn |
Sorry, would that do it? |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:37 |
ADmad |
and please add this link to the book http://book.cakephp.org/view/1608/Virtual-fields |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:36 |
ADmad |
dont want anyone using 1.3 to waste time reading through it only to realize there's already a better way in 1.3 :) |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:36 |
ADmad |
put the note at the top please.. |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:35 |
ADmad |
i still dont see the note like i mentioned above :) |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:35 |
Iiridayn |
kk, changed |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:32 |
ADmad |
Iiridayn: also please change title to "Sorting on aggregate and composite fields using pagination in 1.2" |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:31 |
ADmad |
yup 1.3 is very near stable release... anyways i can publish your article.. just add a note at the very top of you article that in 1.3 you should use the virtualFields features and following this trickery is not necessary |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:28 |
Iiridayn |
RC, anyway |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:28 |
Iiridayn |
I guess I'll have to give it some thought -- I'd love to make public the code, but see that it's not quite what you want on the bakery, since the 1.3 release. |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:26 |
ADmad |
thats sounds better, but the cookbook already has info regarding virtual fields usage.. |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:24 |
Iiridayn |
Hmm. What if I were to restructure it as a brief introduction to virtual fields, with a 1.2 fallback option? I won't be able to for a little while, but would that make it more useful? |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:21 |
ADmad |
*want people to |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:20 |
ADmad |
yeah but in 1.3 we now have virutalFields support which negates the use of any trickery :) and we want to upgrade |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:19 |
Iiridayn |
It's for an older version of Cake at this point, but was useful to a coworker two days back, which reminded me about it |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:18 |
Iiridayn |
http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/sorting-aggregate-and-composite-fields-using-pagination-6 |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:18 |
Iiridayn |
yes, give me a second and I'll paste it here |
| # |
Mar 12th 2010, 15:17 |
ADmad |
Iiridayn: can you link me the article? |
| # |
Mar 7th 2010, 20:50 |
PhpNut |
RichHarri: #cakephp channel |
| # |
Mar 7th 2010, 20:50 |
RichHarri |
Could someone in here assist me with a 'baking' issue? |
| # |
Feb 25th 2010, 02:39 |
aelmasry |
in cakephp channel please can help me |
| # |
Feb 25th 2010, 02:37 |
aelmasry |
@CakeBot : please i have problem |
| # |
Feb 25th 2010, 02:36 |
aelmasry |
cakephp |
| # |
Feb 24th 2010, 18:17 |
PhpNut |
ah ok |
| # |
Feb 24th 2010, 18:16 |
joho68 |
Sorry |
| # |
Feb 24th 2010, 18:16 |
PhpNut |
that is the help channel :) |
| # |
Feb 24th 2010, 18:16 |
joho68 |
Yes, I know.. |
| # |
Feb 24th 2010, 18:16 |
PhpNut |
#cakephp |
| # |
Feb 24th 2010, 18:16 |
joho68 |
Well.. apart from me that is |
| # |
Feb 24th 2010, 18:16 |
joho68 |
-) |
| # |
Feb 24th 2010, 18:16 |
joho68 |
I guess it means everyone gets Cake .. |
| # |
Feb 24th 2010, 18:15 |
PhpNut |
kinda... |
| # |
Feb 24th 2010, 18:14 |
joho68 |
Wow, empty room :-) |
| # |
Feb 15th 2010, 17:52 |
PhpNut |
ok |
| # |
Feb 15th 2010, 17:52 |
ProLoser |
No, I believe predom moved them over from the original site they were at |
| # |
Feb 15th 2010, 17:52 |
PhpNut |
the new version is going to be self moderated by users kinda like the voting on cakeqs is implemented now |
| # |
Feb 15th 2010, 17:51 |
PhpNut |
has there been tickets on another site for bakery rewrite |
| # |
Feb 15th 2010, 17:51 |
PhpNut |
cool |
| # |
Feb 15th 2010, 17:51 |
ProLoser |
alright i suppose for the time being i'll just post to lighthouse then |