| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:39 |
NetersLandreau |
yes pgcd, i think [$this->model()] should be [{$this->model->name}] |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:39 |
pgcd |
Martz =) |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:38 |
Martz |
pgcd: great minds ;P |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:38 |
pgcd |
Neters: where exactly? in the extendedform thingy? |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:38 |
Martz |
darki: but booking_id should be the foreign key of Booking, which has a primary key right? So why not have a seperate field called "reference" and in your beforeSave() or similar, concat the primary key of the account and the foreign key of the booking ID |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:38 |
pgcd |
darki: what about a booking_id *and* an auto_increment? then you concat the two and you're set? |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:37 |
darki |
so if ha make a booking on account 490 i have to find 49003 as next possible booking id |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:37 |
darki |
no booking_id is not the pk - i have differents accounts: 489 490 491 etc. an every account can have booking ids (48901, 49001, 49002 ...) |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:36 |
Martz |
darki: no there is more than that, otherwise you would use auto increment? |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:36 |
darki |
just want to have the next possible number - doesnt matter if it is a string or an int |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:35 |
Martz |
darki: what are you trying to achieve? Whats the bigger picture... |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:35 |
NetersLandreau |
pgcd: i think you should be using [{$this->model->name}], shouldn't you? |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:35 |
darki |
am i right? |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:35 |
darki |
but if it is a string i cant add 1 - so if i find 48904 as last booking_id i cann use '48904'+1 to geht '48905' - i have to cast first |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:34 |
Martz |
could try LIKE 489% |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:34 |
darki |
and i only have to find a way using wildcards ;) |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:33 |
pgcd |
that is very true =) |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:33 |
darki |
;) |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:33 |
darki |
mh okay, than i can use wildcards instead of math condistion |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:33 |
Martz |
pgcd: simplest != bestest ;) |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:33 |
pgcd |
i meant darki, sorry |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:32 |
pgcd |
martz: I think the simplest way would be for you to change that INT field into a string |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:32 |
darki |
i need to get the next possible booking id - the first 3 numbers are set, only the last 2 numbers can change - so booking id is between 48900 and 48999 |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:32 |
pgcd |
Neters: here it is - you'll see it's unlikely it has much of an impact... http://bin.cakephp.org/view/1537795777 |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:31 |
Martz |
darki: but thats such a nasty thing to be doing in your app right? for a booking_id ? |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:31 |
Martz |
or something along those lines? |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:30 |
Martz |
where MAX(field) and field > 489000 AND < 489999 |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:30 |
darki |
martz: guess you are right, i have to overthink how to find the biggest int starting with 489 for example |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:29 |
NetersLandreau |
pgcd: you are close but there is something in the way you are redefining $form that is not exactly right |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:28 |
primeminister |
is it nate? |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:28 |
primeminister |
who is responsible for http://cake.insertdesignhere.com ? |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:28 |
Martz |
something isnt right if you are doing an int with wildcard? Shouldnt it be > or < or = |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:28 |
primeminister |
hi all |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:27 |
darki |
i'll try |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:27 |
NetersLandreau |
i feel badly when i have to refer anyone to the API.. but it is the absolute best source |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:26 |
darki |
mh okay than i need search for my self - not fine because i'm under time pressure |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:26 |
pgcd |
Neters: no, i mean the names i gave to the fields in the swfu init block |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:25 |
NetersLandreau |
darki: that is a question i have seen debated quite often.. the new way to parse conditions has been lambasted in some circles but the coders end up coming around to the new system.. i just don't recall the exact way to do it atm |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:24 |
darki |
i think i need something like "like" |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:23 |
NetersLandreau |
pgcd: it is in the way you extended the form helper |
| # |
Aug 10th 2008, 04:23 |
darki |
neters: should be but why dooes * not work? how can i get all fields beginning with 490 for example? |