# |
Aug 9th 2008, 09:47 |
minicaker |
Hello, could someone answer a little problem? (about scaffolding) |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 09:43 |
minicaker |
hiç |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 09:43 |
minicaker |
hola |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 09:39 |
kalileo |
Cake will see the fields submitted and save them |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 09:39 |
kalileo |
Anon323: just name it correctly and submit and then in your receiving controller method do your Model->save |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 09:37 |
kalileo |
Anon323: doesn't matter who created the field |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 09:34 |
Anon323 |
is every database table field accessable via a form input? e.g., if there is a field "foo", can someone manually add a form input element for "foo" so that the contained value will be automatically saved by cake? or will cake dismiss every form input element that was not created by cake itself? |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 09:24 |
linked_ |
greetings |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 09:23 |
lqdice__ |
http://www.oracle.com/technology/pub/articles/php_experts/rasmus_php.html |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 09:23 |
lqdice__ |
good explanation by the creator of PHP on why its got messy function naming and some inconsistencies |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:40 |
lqdice__ |
i hope they drop php4 in the next release |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:39 |
francky06l |
next one will be 2.0 |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:39 |
lqdice__ |
so 1.3 wont be out soon .. and i think they want to go 2.0 after 1.2 |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:39 |
lqdice__ |
1.2 is not even GA yet |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:39 |
cpierce_ |
oh 1.3 will be out in a week don't switch to 1.2 wait for 1.3 |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:39 |
cpierce_ |
i was making sure there wasn't something like |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:35 |
markstory |
has a long history of performance. Doesnt' have all the 'bloat' of pagination, and fancy form generation. |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:35 |
markstory |
I'm a fan of 0.6 |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:30 |
AD7six |
cpierce_: what kind of answer did you expect |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:29 |
cpierce_ |
AD7six: your sarcasm speaks tons! |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:29 |
AD7six |
cpierce_: for future projects 1.2 is obviously a terrible choice. use 0.92 |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:29 |
francky06l |
cpierce_: if its a new project you should go for 1.2 .. 1.1 is end of life .. |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:28 |
francky06l |
cpierce_: I guess find in 1.1 is as find('first' in 1.2 ... But AD7six suggestion is better (did not remember the neigbors in 1.1) |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:28 |
cpierce_ |
i'm saying for future projects is 1.2 easy too? |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:28 |
cpierce_ |
i really like how 1.1 works |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:28 |
AD7six |
y |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:27 |
cpierce_ |
should i go ahead and go to 1.2 |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:27 |
cpierce_ |
i'm just starting out |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:27 |
cpierce_ |
francky06l: oh i see what you are saying and then do limit 1 to only get the 1 result... |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:26 |
AD7six |
in 1.1. findNeighbours |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:26 |
francky06l |
cpierce_: I do not remember much of cake 1.1 but something as $this->Model->find(array('id > '.$last_id)), should do it ..You would have to pass the last_id along with your ajax call |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:25 |
AD7six |
cpierce_: see find('neighbors' |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:25 |
francky06l |
cpierce_: well ..no what would be next except it could be > last_id |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:24 |
cpierce_ |
could i not use some kind of ->next do do that? |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:24 |
cpierce_ |
yes |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:24 |
francky06l |
cpierce_: your table is ordered by id initially ... |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:23 |
francky06l |
cpierce_: condition is id > last_id and limit 1 ... Of course you need to pass the last id |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:23 |
cpierce_ |
not sure i follow franchy |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:23 |
francky06l |
cpierce_: you can use the id as condition (ie: last id) ... and limit 1 |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:22 |
cpierce_ |
and if 100 in there i want to do the same with the whole 100 |
# |
Aug 9th 2008, 08:22 |
cpierce_ |
say there are 3 fields in the database i want to pull 1, then 2, then 3, then 1 again |