# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:51 |
markstory |
better than a kick in the groin |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:51 |
ADmad |
free as in beer |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:51 |
joeb |
It is a good deal really. |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:51 |
markstory |
for the low price of free. |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:50 |
joeb |
Sold! |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:50 |
markstory |
joeb: he chooses nothing. |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:50 |
joeb |
dogmatic69: So, until you talk to those people and get them to give you data, you can have this, or.. nothing? |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:50 |
markstory |
3k a day is pretty good I think :) |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:50 |
joeb |
dogmatic69: Beggars. Choosers. All that fun stuff. |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:49 |
ADmad |
t0nic: hint.. you need to use "multiple" in your custom validator not "notEmpty" |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:49 |
dogmatic69 |
joeb: that is nothing... hotscripts in in cake and ff plugins afaik thats millions |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:49 |
markstory |
and they have open source code. |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:49 |
markstory |
dogmatic69: addons.mozilla.org gets lots of traffic. |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:48 |
joeb |
dogmatic69: It gets around 3k of visitors a day, so it should be a pretty good testing. |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:47 |
brookshire |
harpoon1: why not just fix it with css? |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:47 |
t0nic |
how do I refer to Video HABTM Tag['id'] -> notEmpty |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:46 |
t0nic |
what i'm trying to do isn't referred to in that custom validation |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:46 |
joeb |
Haha, no. |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:46 |
dogmatic69 |
P |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:46 |
dogmatic69 |
thats handy... is it facebook2.com? |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:46 |
joeb |
dogmatic69: We're rolling out a new site for a client, it doesn't have any real use yet |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:46 |
dogmatic69 |
joeb: i want to see it now |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:45 |
t0nic |
wait, no |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:45 |
joeb |
dogmatic69: Gimmie a month. |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:45 |
joeb |
dogmatic69: Yeah? |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:45 |
t0nic |
didn't see anything addressing my situation but I'll tias! |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:45 |
dogmatic69 |
ACTION wants to see the benchmark for a good cake site |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:45 |
t0nic |
nm i'll try the write your own function thing |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:45 |
harpoon1 |
hang on... |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:45 |
Phally |
dogmatic69: no :p |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:44 |
t0nic |
well it's a short section |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:44 |
dogmatic69 |
t0nic: that was fast |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:44 |
joeb |
harpoon1: And it's becoming a null value? |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:44 |
t0nic |
dogmatic69: hmm that didn't really help :( |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:44 |
harpoon1 |
joeb: tried that |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:44 |
joeb |
harpoon1: Try setting the variable at the very top to something like "test" and see if it's just not being touched? |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:44 |
dogmatic69 |
Phally: can i see :) |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:43 |
Phally |
dogmatic69: yes |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:43 |
dogmatic69 |
Phally: you got any sites floating around the net done in cake? |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:43 |
harpoon1 |
joeb: I'm not saying the core does not work... I"m not trying to fix the core, but overide it's function... |
# |
Oct 22nd 2009, 13:42 |
dogmatic69 |
np |