Log message #1109735

# At Username Text
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:29 markstory Ceeram: and I run the tests in 5.2.10 and 4.4.9
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:29 ionas t0nic, I do not see your issue there
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:28 ionas t0nic, 'AliasName' => array('className' => 'ModelName')
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:28 Ceeram hmm
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:28 markstory I don't get any of the fails you do.
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:28 markstory Ceeram: no
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:27 Ceeram markstory: you dont get fail on ModelRead test?
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:27 t0nic http://is.gd/4vVNL "However, aliases must be unique both within a single model and on both sides of a belongsTo/hasMany or a belongsTo/hasOne relationship. Choosing non-unique names for model aliases can cause unexpected behavior."
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:27 ionas Comment: id, created, body, user_id, username, email, url - the latter 4 maybe NULL - its either user_id or those 3 fields filled with data
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:26 ionas you don't need an author model just because you "could" build it
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:26 ionas I don't get that
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:26 ionas hm?
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:26 t0nic just cuz all the names would match up
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:25 t0nic it'd be easier for comments to have a "User" and not an "Author [user]"
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:25 t0nic ionas: I'm wondering if I *must*
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:24 ionas generally you can reference one model with two different aliases
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:24 ionas or User hasMany Friend HasMany User
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:24 ionas like User HasMany Video HasMany Comment BelongsTo User
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:23 ionas you can have recursion if you mean that
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:22 t0nic the book says it can cause "unexpected behavior" so I'm not sure how to test for it
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:22 t0nic can Question->Answer->User also have "answer belongsTo "User", or must I make it "Answerer"?
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:21 t0nic do I need ALL associations (e.g. all relationships to user) named differently, or just those that are in the same "chain" (e.g. User<-Video->Comment->User)
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:20 NoReGreT Phally: isn't that close to this http://www.studiocanaria.com/articles/cakephp_auth_component_users_groups_permissions_revisited ?
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:18 Horror fastest solution i can think of for now
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:17 Horror jcrawford : i'm just gonna create a temporary table that will combine the 2 results into one
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:13 NoReGreT thanks
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:13 Phally NoReGreT: here is the concept: http://thechaw.com/bakery/wiki/spec/users/Group_permissions
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:13 jcrawford see this comment cake_newbie http://us2.php.net/manual/en/language.oop5.decon.php#94003
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:12 jcrawford yes to make it work in php 4 you need to create a method with the same name as the class and have that call the __construct method. It is what you have to do in order to make applications backwards compatable with php 4
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:12 Phally NoReGreT: yeah, you wish :p
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:12 NoReGreT Phally: let me take a peak at your awesome code :)
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:11 Phally NoReGreT: i pull out my awesome reusable code and make it happen :)
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:11 jcrawford cake_newbie: well yea __construct will not work in php 4 as it was introduced in php 5
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:11 NoReGreT Phally: what you do if you have 3 groups and each group has certain permissions/things to do ?
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:08 cake_newbie this makes to work php4
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:08 cake_newbie }
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:08 cake_newbie $this->__construct();
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:08 cake_newbie function DATABASE_CONFIG() {
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:08 cake_newbie found a solution :)
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:01 cake_newbie __constructor doesnt works
# Oct 22nd 2009, 09:00 cake_newbie i use __construct