| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:39 |
teknoid |
bG^_: hmm... why couldn't you do a save() on a view? ... the only thing that might be missing is a primary key, but you can define some column to act as one |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:37 |
TommyO |
moelee: the Inflector can handle some pretty complex exceptions. it also gives you a place to define your own rules |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:36 |
bG^_ |
teknoid: as long you you don't call save() on such model, and only do reads, it should work |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:36 |
teknoid |
bG^_: i'm don't see why not... although i haven't tried it :) |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:36 |
TommyO |
moelee: quite well |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:36 |
moelee |
how does cake handle words that are both plural and singular |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:35 |
moelee |
just out of curiosity |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:35 |
moelee |
hm |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:35 |
bG^_ |
teknoid: oh.. great :) didn't know if it's ok with cake to treat views as models as well... |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:35 |
teknoid |
bG^_: just make a model for the view |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:32 |
bG^_ |
is there an easy way to make all my "reads" from db views instead of db tables rather than writing the query myself? |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:27 |
TommyO |
contain is driving me batty. one minute it creates a left join, the next minute it doesn't :) first time really exploring its depths |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:24 |
lqdice__ |
oh ok |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:24 |
TommyO |
no, I mean in my own models |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:24 |
lqdice__ |
oh you made the tree behavior? |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:24 |
TommyO |
lqdice__: I'm in the process of reworking a lot of this type of method so that it's used like: $this->find('children', ... |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:23 |
lqdice__ |
took only an hour or so |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:23 |
lqdice__ |
) |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:23 |
TommyO |
lqdice__: looks good |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:22 |
lqdice__ |
it could get heavy if a user has tons of access but since it allows you to give people access at the parent nodes there shouldnt be a problem |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:21 |
lqdice__ |
used both contain and regular conditions |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:20 |
lqdice__ |
TommyO: http://bin.cakephp.org/view/577899715 .. users have groups so this is what nodes the group has access to |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:19 |
TommyO |
lqdice__: cool. the kind of conditions that containable might help with? |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:12 |
lqdice__ |
TommyO: I got it .. the tree thing.. it's a bit of work but not tooo bad.. you do have to do custom conditions on left/right nodes |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:10 |
TommyO |
iirc |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:10 |
TommyO |
as far as views/layous are concerned, it used the app's where necessary |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:09 |
TommyO |
mandys: sorry, I thought you were talking solely about unit testing |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:09 |
TommyO |
oh I see. hmmm. |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:08 |
mandys |
and it doesn't create the views directory under app/tests/ |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:08 |
mandys |
not web testing |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:08 |
mandys |
the caketest examples are all for unit testing |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:08 |
mandys |
i just am confused whether to use caketest or cakewebtest for web page testing |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:08 |
mandys |
i even wrote sample tests |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:08 |
mandys |
and run tests |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:08 |
mandys |
i can view /tests.php |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:08 |
mandys |
i have setup everything |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:08 |
mandys |
TommyO: i am passed that stage |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:06 |
TommyO |
*let |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:06 |
TommyO |
your app will have a url that will elt you run the core tests and your custom app tests |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:05 |
TommyO |
mandys: then look into how the core tests are written to write tests for your own app |
| # |
Aug 7th 2008, 14:04 |
TommyO |
mandys: bake an app skeleton and it will bake the proper test directory structure for you. bake a model and it bakes the model test file skeleton for you, etc |