Log message #107051

# At Username Text
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:17 francky06l Swiatecki: for now, i have a company and I do some consulting in IT ....
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:17 MrRio Ahh right, francky06l said you were :P
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:17 TommyO MrRio: I'm not. :)
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:17 Swiatecki as?
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:17 francky06l Swiatecki: well I work :-)
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:16 francky06l Tom_M_: and what are the results ? nothing wrong for me in the code (read quickly thouth)
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:16 Swiatecki francky06l: what do you do for a living?
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:16 MrRio TommyO: Hey, how did you become a CakePHP Certified Engineer?
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:16 francky06l -)
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:16 francky06l Swiatecki: it could be worse
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:16 Swiatecki oh man! sweet?!
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:15 francky06l Swiatecki: Monaco when I am at work, South France now (home)
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:14 Swiatecki francky06l: where you located?
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:14 Tom_M_ http://bin.cakephp.org/view/728516538
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:14 francky06l Swiatecki: gtm - 1 for me
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:14 Mathachew right
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:14 francky06l Tom_M_: can we see the query ?
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:14 Tom_M_ i mean i guess its running like a find all when i want read
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:14 TommyO authorize is an Auth member
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:14 TommyO authorize() is not an Auth method
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:13 Tom_M_ it's always array[0] [model] ...
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:13 Swiatecki you! on the chan
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:13 Tom_M_ anyone know when using the containable behavior i'm getting an extra (unneeded?) key in my array ...
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:13 TommyO Mathachew: hmm... hold on that actually...
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:13 Mathachew TommyO: Ok, I want to stop it at the hand off to authorization. So I guess I just do authorize('*')
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:13 francky06l Swiatecki: localtime for whom ?
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:13 Swiatecki localtime where you are?
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:12 TommyO Mathachew: $this->allow('*'); will allow all users to pass through to isAuthorized, where your ACL then handles all logic
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:12 nymacro yeah, I might give that a try
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:12 francky06l nymacro: have you got mysql ? to find out, try with it...if it's works then means the driver for your db...has to be improved
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:12 TommyO Mathachew: ok. this is the logic. Auth will see if Authenticated. if it is it hands off to Authorization, if not it checks to see what the basic logic is for Authorization by checking the allow/deny rules
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:11 nymacro been using http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/how-to-use-acl-in-1-2-x for reference to get it up and running
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:11 francky06l MrRio: ask TommyO ..he is :-)
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:10 nymacro francky06l: the table is there, and my ACL is pretty simple at the moment
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:10 Mathachew francky06l: how? One is for authorization, the other is for authentication
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:10 francky06l Mathachew: well you are using then Auth + ACL
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:10 MrRio Hey, I'd like to become a CakePHP certified engineer. Anyone I can talk to about this?
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:09 Mathachew francky06l: I'm not using ACL with Auth; they're separate and have no correlation (or at least that's what I'm trying to achieve). I'm using ACL to determine if the controller/action is granted or denied to the current user, regardless of who they are. I want to use Auth to log a user in and out, not determine if the user has access to the current page
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:08 francky06l seems that your tree table is not there, or not complient
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:08 francky06l nymacro: does not look like a DB error to me
# Aug 6th 2008, 17:07 Mathachew I'm not explaining it clearly enough then