| # |
Sep 23rd 2009, 07:06 |
alkemann |
Phally: http://bin.cakephp.org/view/236643793 |
| # |
Sep 23rd 2009, 05:27 |
alkemann |
hmm, yes... child could be a tutorial of the code article maybe? |
| # |
Sep 23rd 2009, 05:27 |
alkemann |
if I create a translated article (or for some other reason make a child article) should I be allowed to put my article in a different category than the parent? |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 13:34 |
Phally |
that's right |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 13:32 |
alkemann |
yea well 1.3 isnt done yet, but we shouldnt build incompatabilities into it |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 12:44 |
Phally |
alkemann: not yet, going to now, bakery branch 2.0, cake branch 1.3? |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 12:43 |
alkemann |
Phally: u pull my stuff? it pass on urs? u find ur fails? |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 08:09 |
alkemann |
ok. lets just let each article create it's own slug and leave this feature to the parent_id and lang fields |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 08:08 |
alkemann |
an important part is perhaps not to waste time one something that will very rarely if at all happen |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 08:08 |
alkemann |
well.. there are several aspects to it |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 08:05 |
ADmad|away |
in that case i dont think you should "fix" the chars... you can have utf chars in url cant you ? |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 08:04 |
Phally |
i think the slug should be translated with it, for SEO since the url then contain norwegian words then, you don't have to look out for duplicate content, since the language is in the url to, which makes the url different |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 07:56 |
alkemann |
you craete article "How I met Santa", the slug becomes "How-I-met-Santa", then I write a translated article of this, ie a "child article" as per our current spec, I translate the title to "Hvordan jeg møtte nissen", should my new article create a new slug, ie "Hvordan-jeg-moette-nissen" (notice fixing special character), or perhaps would it be better to create a url like "/nob/How-met-Santa" ? and what about articles that is not a tra |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:35 |
alkemann |
i thought calling create() would be good so as to not include model state from before in the test |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:35 |
alkemann |
ah calling Model->create() befure and update Save() resets the non included fields |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:33 |
alkemann |
yea something very weird going on. imma gonna try to debug around and see |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:28 |
Phally |
thats weird, does it remove the record? because usually counts don't lie or maybe it is the counterscope that doesn't match the edited record |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:25 |
alkemann |
ok. i edit a page and somehow it reduces the page count |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:24 |
Phally |
alkemann: well not now, i'm at work, but i can tonight |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:19 |
alkemann |
Phally: can u pull the 20 branch and tell me if you can see why the last test of the CounterCache test fails? |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:10 |
Phally |
also i will see that the deprecation errors will be removed |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:10 |
alkemann |
ok, thanks |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:09 |
Phally |
i'll think about it, let me see if i can come up with something |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:08 |
alkemann |
UserAppProfile , ie a model that is shared but reused differenlt by each app or a UserBakeryProfile and a UserBookProfile.. i dont know |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:08 |
alkemann |
the best idea i know we have discussed so far is each app has a UserProfile and the group_id field is in that table |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:07 |
Phally |
the login action is in the plugin too |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:07 |
Phally |
yeah, but how do you get it in the session? |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:07 |
Phally |
there wouldn't be anything to check against |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:07 |
alkemann |
with a group_id, just not in a plugin table |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:07 |
Phally |
without a group_id, how would you want to do the permissions and stuff? |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:05 |
Phally |
it wasn failing last time i checked, perhaps some new changes were made in 1.3 |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:05 |
alkemann |
yea i agree with the renaming |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:05 |
Phally |
alkemann: oh yeah, i renamed the prefix to something more clear and nicer and more consistent |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:05 |
alkemann |
i wonder if we can get one of them henchmen that gwoo recruited to convert our tests to controller / view code |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:04 |
Phally |
alkemann: let me read |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:04 |
Phally |
alkemann: i always lunch long :) |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:04 |
alkemann |
phally-lunch: so Users_Controller test fails 3 of them, with 3 warnings of deprecations with 1.3 |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 05:03 |
alkemann |
phally-lunch: thats a long lunch |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 04:26 |
alkemann |
phally-lunch: also, why do you have group_id as part of the users table? we need to have it app specific |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 04:26 |
alkemann |
but i guess if i need user, thats hpow it needs to be |
| # |
Sep 22nd 2009, 04:26 |
alkemann |
sucks that now i have to include all ur fixtures in my app tests |