| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 14:43 |
ypnos |
or do I need to maintain a strict numbering? (tags.0.id, tags.1.id, â?¦ etc)? |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 14:43 |
ypnos |
is it possible to add to the array of tags? |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 14:43 |
ypnos |
because I add inputs dynamically via javascript |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 14:43 |
ypnos |
if I don't have a numbering, though |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 14:42 |
ypnos |
normally the input identifiers look like "tags.0.id", "tags.0.name" etc. |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 14:42 |
ypnos |
so I want to submit a form with array elements (hasMany) |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 14:42 |
ypnos |
hello everybody |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 14:17 |
inoas |
admad sometimes I really dislike the way you handle things |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 14:15 |
crazycoder |
hmic, ^^ ? |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:54 |
crazycoder |
i think i must implement Session.timeout |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:52 |
crazycoder |
i think cake is setting something strange... |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:52 |
crazycoder |
the auth component block me first |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:51 |
crazycoder |
but it is not true! i mean... i am logged out before closing the browser |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:51 |
crazycoder |
Lifetime in seconds of cookie or, if 0, until browser is restarted. <<<< |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:51 |
crazycoder |
hmic, weird! i just checked the php.ini and i found it with 0 value |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:50 |
crazycoder |
ok |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:40 |
hmic |
i might be wrong, but i do account that to larrys strategy |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:39 |
crazycoder |
i mean what is the point of setting it inside the app.php |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:39 |
crazycoder |
so what is the point of changin that value if i must change it in the php.ini ? |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:39 |
crazycoder |
i am using this |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:39 |
crazycoder |
hmic, https://gist.github.com/anonymous/c5ac29462c8c876498ba22a466395bd1 |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:38 |
hmic |
- i'm pissed! |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:38 |
hmic |
but fragment the community and call that a good idea? |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:38 |
hmic |
close down irc, force everybody to slack, account for the friction loss - i would be lost e.g. |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:37 |
hmic |
it just fragments the community |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:37 |
hmic |
what about slack? does it make anything better or easier? to whom? |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:37 |
hmic |
who needs a new logo and branding? which developer does care about that? |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:37 |
hmic |
on the other hand, the so called good decisions are completely pointless |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:36 |
hmic |
dont get me wrong, i do like cake a lot, i really do! but there are lots of decisions that are bad. bad for the community and support |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:35 |
hmic |
because its actually true! it's just plain bad management and communication |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:35 |
hmic |
so why is the perception on these topics this bad on cake? |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:35 |
hmic |
you need to hold on the promise which cake did not *again* |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:35 |
hmic |
if you encourage ppl to upgrade seemlessly between minor versions |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:34 |
hmic |
2.6 already was a major bc break, as 3.3 is |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:34 |
hmic |
despite its numbering |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:34 |
hmic |
which the current one does not |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:34 |
hmic |
it would be another schema, yes. but it would actually hold true for the BC guidelines! |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:33 |
inoas |
like, the issue would be that at max 4.0 (current 3.0) would then be supported "LTS" |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:32 |
inoas |
hmic would you have prefered for 2.6 to be 3.0, for lithium to be 3.0, for current 3.0 to be 4.0, for 3.3 to be 5.0 and for "the next 4.0" to actually be CakePHP 6.0 ;)? |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:31 |
hmic |
as there are constraints |
| # |
Sep 27th 2016, 13:30 |
hmic |
if you are using the php session handler you need to check the php.ini too |