| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:17 |
hiromi |
markstory: oh ... :( |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:17 |
hiromi |
with reading source , there is view cache usgin own file cache |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:17 |
markstory |
you can't put full page caches into memcache :( |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:16 |
hiromi |
is there way to cache action with memcache? |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:16 |
markstory |
sweet |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:14 |
dakota |
lol |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:14 |
dakota |
and simple php gets 2668 |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:14 |
dakota |
1.2.6 gets 5259.45 requests per second |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:14 |
dakota |
1.3 gets 5959.7 requests per second |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:14 |
dakota |
hehe, I conclude that cakephp is faster then a standard php file with echo 'hello world'; in |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:13 |
dakota |
yup |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:13 |
markstory |
saves many afterfind workarounds. |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:13 |
markstory |
yeah they are quite handy :) |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:11 |
dakota |
got to say, virtualFields are my favourite new feature :) |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:10 |
dakota |
and from my tests |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:10 |
markstory |
(faster from my tests) |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:10 |
markstory |
true, and with 1.3 running faster and having more features that 1.2 I think its an improvement. |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:08 |
dakota |
hardware is cheap, devs aren't |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:08 |
dakota |
the strength in CakePHP for me is not so much in the performance but in the rapid development time |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:07 |
dakota |
ye, saw that |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:07 |
markstory |
The zend guys showed that with their reply to the symfony benchmarks. |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:07 |
dakota |
and if your not careful it is easy to do the same thing by accident |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:07 |
dakota |
yup |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:07 |
markstory |
and find exactly what you were looking for. |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:07 |
markstory |
its relatively easy to make one sided benchmarks. |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:06 |
markstory |
I know :) |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:05 |
dakota |
it is so easy to setup a benchmark that looks neutral but in fact favours one particular test subject |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:05 |
markstory |
depending on what you are doing it can be made to go much faster as well. |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:04 |
markstory |
Last time I did benchmarks, (more than month ago) 1.3 was faster. |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:03 |
markstory |
I know |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:03 |
dakota |
well, just did the exact same test but with apache 2.2 and CakePHP 1.3 gives me better results |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:03 |
markstory |
I'm not replying to it though. |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:03 |
dakota |
markstory: Ok :) |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:02 |
markstory |
dakota: I saw it. |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 23:01 |
dakota |
Anybody seen this: http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/e011b39e16e179d8 |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 22:56 |
AlejoMix |
anyone knows if theres a memcache for windows ? |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 22:41 |
jpcbarros |
markstory: thanks |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 22:40 |
markstory |
considering RC1 came out last week, its probably more stable than the beta which is a month+ old |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 22:38 |
markstory |
which one came out last |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 22:38 |
markstory |
guess |
| # |
Mar 5th 2010, 22:36 |
jpcbarros |
Guys, i am going to start using CakePHP 1.3. Whats the latest more stable version: 1.3-beta or 1.3-RC1 ? |