Page 49 of 211,234, showing 20 records out of 4,224,675 total, starting on record 961, ending on 980
# | Username | Text | |
---|---|---|---|
# | Aug 6th 2008, 21:34 | FurnaceBoy | renan_saddam, ah mineiro! I've visited BH once! great food , mulheres boas bastante risos |
# | Aug 6th 2008, 21:34 | loki_racer | cobol search to the rescue |
# | Aug 6th 2008, 21:35 | nymacro | thanks, was exactly what I needed. I'm not good with this web dev stuff (i usually recurse ad infinitum) |
# | Aug 6th 2008, 21:35 | t73net | hehe |
# | Aug 6th 2008, 21:35 | t73net | default recursion limit is 1 unless implicitly set |
# | Aug 6th 2008, 21:35 | renan_saddam | FurnaceBoy: are you serious about you? are you not brazillian? you know what mineiro means.. :P |
# | Aug 6th 2008, 21:36 | nymacro | makes sense |
# | Aug 6th 2008, 21:36 | achew22 | gwoo: I don't want to set the keys, I want to append data into a nested array. I'm trying to do a hybrid merge thingy. |
# | Aug 6th 2008, 21:36 | nymacro | I just assumed it would step down the heirarchy till it has nothing left to get |
# | Aug 6th 2008, 21:36 | t73net | hehe nope |
# | Aug 6th 2008, 21:37 | gwoo | achew22: look at the other methods of the Set class |
# | Aug 6th 2008, 21:37 | cobol | nymacro: the problem is that if someone accidentally defines something recursive, that could be really hard to debug |
# | Aug 6th 2008, 21:37 | FurnaceBoy | renan_saddam, claro q sim, tenho muitos amigos brasileiros ... mineiros tb. |
# | Aug 6th 2008, 21:37 | gwoo | achew22: if its possible its in there |
# | Aug 6th 2008, 21:37 | cobol | besides, you dont often show all levels of relation |
# | Aug 6th 2008, 21:37 | achew22 | gwoo: yeah I've been playing with merge but I don't think this will get it :( |
# | Aug 6th 2008, 21:37 | t73net | cobol: True that |
# | Aug 6th 2008, 21:37 | achew22 | I think I have to for each it |
# | Aug 6th 2008, 21:38 | gwoo | achew22: pushDiff |
# | Aug 6th 2008, 21:38 | t73net | you could foreach array_map it |