Page 233 of 211,260, showing 20 records out of 4,225,199 total, starting on record 4,641, ending on 4,660
# | Username | Text | |
---|---|---|---|
# | Aug 8th 2008, 05:43 | franko | I have user hasOne registration [dependant], want to delete the associated user when I delete the registration... |
# | Aug 8th 2008, 05:43 | pgcd | fourcs: found the solution. it's the danged firefox caching the danged selects. grrr. |
# | Aug 8th 2008, 05:44 | pgcd | wasted like hours on this... |
# | Aug 8th 2008, 05:44 | annnna | imagine what you would've wasted using IE |
# | Aug 8th 2008, 05:45 | annnna | testing is awfully impossible at least for me... |
# | Aug 8th 2008, 05:45 | pgcd | annnna: IE for development is hell. i avoid it until the very last moment |
# | Aug 8th 2008, 05:45 | annnna | franko: there are options in the array for that, i think they are the ones called "dependant" and "exclusive" |
# | Aug 8th 2008, 05:46 | pgcd | and when i do get to it, i try to pretend everything works by squinting very hard =) |
# | Aug 8th 2008, 05:46 | franko | annnna: cheers, do you mean the model relationship array? will look over the docs again... |
# | Aug 8th 2008, 05:47 | fourcs | Glad you got it! |
# | Aug 8th 2008, 05:47 | fourcs | Got to go. Hope to see you again. |
# | Aug 8th 2008, 05:48 | pgcd | fourcs: bye |
# | Aug 8th 2008, 05:48 | annnna | yep that one. Im trying to find it for you in the cookbook or API for 1.2 but it's there in the 1.1 documentation, which was better |
# | Aug 8th 2008, 05:51 | annnna | franko: this bit comes from the 1.1 PDF manual which is a gem unparalleled: • dependent: if set to true, the associated model is destroyed when this one is. |
# | Aug 8th 2008, 05:52 | annnna | franko: still quoting-> For example, if the "Cool Blue" profile is associated to "Bob", and I delete the user "Bob", the profile "Cool Blue" will also be deleted. |
# | Aug 8th 2008, 05:53 | franko | anna: thats cool, understand that one - what I was wanting is to delete profile and then Bob is deleted also... |
# | Aug 8th 2008, 05:53 | franko | np, will just delete the parent object... :-) |
# | Aug 8th 2008, 05:53 | annnna | franko: yeah i'm seeing that.... now i realize, sorry. Let me read a bit more |
# | Aug 8th 2008, 05:54 | franko | annna: thanks, I think I will just refactor to delete the user and just have the dependency from that relationship kick in... |
# | Aug 8th 2008, 05:55 | franko | annnna: your name is hard to get right huh :-p |