Page 1 of 134, showing 100 records out of 13,394 total, starting on record 1, ending on 100
| # | Username | Text | |
|---|---|---|---|
| # | Feb 15th 2009, 11:34 | gwoo | i added bakery |
| # | Feb 15th 2009, 11:35 | alkemann | ! |
| # | Feb 15th 2009, 11:35 | alkemann | can we get log here? |
| # | Feb 15th 2009, 11:36 | alkemann | !seen teknoid |
| # | Feb 15th 2009, 11:37 | gwoo | ~apilookup param param |
| # | Feb 15th 2009, 11:38 | alkemann | close! |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 06:50 | alkemann | who is accepting articles to bakery lately? |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 10:56 | alkemann | gwoo: see the use case list? too many? |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 10:57 | gwoo | alkemann: just waking up |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 10:57 | gwoo | have not looked yet |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 10:57 | alkemann | good morning. i just came home from after job workout.. timezones a bitch :p |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 10:58 | gwoo | hehe |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 10:58 | gwoo | yeah seriously |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 10:58 | gwoo | its a holiday here today too :) |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 10:59 | alkemann | what holiday |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 10:59 | gwoo | Presidents Day |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 10:59 | alkemann | all of them? heh |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:00 | gwoo | yup |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:00 | gwoo | really it is to honor Washington and Lincoln |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:00 | gwoo | Lincoln's bday is on the 7th |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:00 | gwoo | and Washington is the 15 |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:00 | alkemann | if they devide the day between then, i assume Cliton has the "happy hour" ? |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:00 | gwoo | so the 2nd Monday of every February is presidents day |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:01 | alkemann | s/then/them |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:01 | alkemann | and Clinton.. i guess i cant type |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:01 | gwoo | Clinton made people happy |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:02 | gwoo | except when he was getting blowjobs in the oval office |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:02 | gwoo | oops this channel is logged now |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:02 | alkemann | haha |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:02 | alkemann | who's gonna read it but us though :p |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:05 | alkemann | u told me to keep a look out.. i dont know if it's teknoid, but i think some of the latest stuff on bakery is a bit sub par |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:08 | gwoo | alkemann: yeah its either teknoid, or mariano_iglesias |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:08 | alkemann | my soon to be partner (in crime, not marriage), had an idea i asked him to write up for the bakery specc. i just got the gist of it, but i think it was something like : when a new article is posted by regular users, everyone above that level can read and rate them. instead of being published by single moderator, they get published after x amount of yes votes or by the rating system. or some such |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:09 | jperras | alkemann: just saw the list of use cases |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:09 | jperras | alkemann: thanks a ton. this'll help a lot with wireframes |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:09 | alkemann | great |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:11 | alkemann | it will give those accepted authors (who we will accept for quality) a say, spread the power, added level of QA and ease the workload of single moderators |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:12 | alkemann | as i said, i'll have him do a write up off it, but i like the general concept at least |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:13 | alkemann | and speaking about my coworker Ronny and bakery. he wrote up the article on the Dummy plugin and it is now pending moderation |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:13 | gwoo | alkemann: i kinda like that |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:14 | gwoo | we can promote people based on how many articles they have written |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:14 | jperras | while we're on the topic of article ranking, I was wondering whether or not we are going to keep the same ranking scheme as the previous bakery |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:14 | jperras | i.e. rating of 1 to 5 stars |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:15 | gwoo | what else do you suggest? |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:15 | alkemann | if you need x amount of points before the article goes public, we could give different power of voting to different user types and for amount of accepted articles |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:15 | alkemann | here im not talking about the 1-5, but this behind the scenes publish or not system |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:15 | jperras | gwoo: there's always the binomial scheme of "vote up" and "vote down", e.g. +1 and -1 |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:15 | alkemann | bakery is not digg |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:16 | jperras | alkemann: yeah, I just needed a segueway to hijack the discussion ;-) |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:16 | alkemann | comedy! |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:16 | jperras | alkemann: of course not. but a site having a +1, -1 voting system does not make it digg |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:16 | gwoo | alkemann: then we need the up/down for the "authorities" |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:16 | alkemann | yes |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:16 | jperras | the two are independent |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:17 | alkemann | i like the public rating of 1-5. articles being editable, you can try to improve it and ppl can rate again. up or down i more a popularity contest than a rating |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:18 | alkemann | with rating u can compare two articles that dont cover the same topic. up/down you compare all articles on how is most popular. we can do that with "views! |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:18 | alkemann | -!+" |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:18 | jperras | I'm not trying to pass judgement on one rating system versus another, just get an idea of what is planned |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:19 | alkemann | i know. but im passing judgement in so far as that i answered your question with my oppinion :p |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:20 | alkemann | I am a bit socially retarded.. was i terribly rude now? |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:20 | gwoo | yes |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:20 | gwoo | haha |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:20 | gwoo | alkemann: but you always are :P |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:20 | gwoo | jperras: i like 1-5 too |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:20 | jperras | heh, don't worry about it. My internet filter works quite well ;-) |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:21 | alkemann | at least im consistent |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:21 | jperras | it's hard to give constructive criticism and opinions on the net |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:21 | jperras | since everyone takes them as attacks |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:22 | jperras | I've learned that most of the time that intentions are usually honourable. so no worries alkemann |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:22 | alkemann | i am brutally honest. its a character flaw |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:23 | alkemann | well. anyways. about presidents and bjs.. |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:23 | jperras | alright then, 1-5 it is. |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:24 | alkemann | jperras: good news is that you may get to make both since we may use the yes/no for behind the scenes moderation |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:26 | jperras | cool |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:26 | alkemann | jperras: btw, if u plan on doing something with ratings in the mock, it would be cool if it included what the ratings meant.. (ie 1 = This is garbage and shouldnt be here. 3 = This is a decent article. 5 = Best article on the subject, articles covering same topic should be removed) |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:27 | jperras | alright, I'll try and fit that in |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:27 | alkemann | or how ever non hostile you would want to write it if u are nicer than me :p |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:27 | jperras | however, if the articles are moderated, I'm guessing the ratings will usually be skewed towards the higher numbers |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:29 | alkemann | sure, but as gwoo has pointed out about the current version. since u have to log in to rate. we get few ratings, usually by people that care and have a valid oppinion. |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:29 | alkemann | thats paraphrasing a little :) |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:32 | jperras | good point. which is also why I'm waiting to do the ranking algorithms until I get the current ranking data |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:32 | alkemann | off course ppl may ha different oppinions than the mods |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:33 | gwoo | jperras: i thought i sent it to you |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:34 | jperras | gwoo: I didn't get it |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:34 | jperras | might have been spam-filtered |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:34 | gwoo | jperras: would be hard for you because it looks like i never sent it |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:34 | jperras | hehe |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:34 | alkemann | lol |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:35 | alkemann | meant to and did are very close in the memory bank i beleive |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:35 | gwoo | yeah |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:35 | gwoo | especially in my mind |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:35 | gwoo | with the 10,000 things going through |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:39 | jperras | gwoo: got it. grazi |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:39 | alkemann | what do you do when you freeze on your arms and your eyes is going dry from the warm air coming from the heat pump above me? |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:39 | gwoo | nice |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:39 | gwoo | alkemann: move futher away from the heat source |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:40 | gwoo | and put on a sweater |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:40 | alkemann | what does it help you that i have a heat pump? that made no sense.. heh |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 11:40 | alkemann | seems like a logical solution. brb |
| # | Feb 16th 2009, 14:10 | ADmad | alkemann: really liked the idea about article going live for general public after reaching some level of rating from higher level users |