| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:24 |
jperras |
4 give it 1 star |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:24 |
jperras |
5 people rate an article |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:24 |
jperras |
simple example: |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:24 |
jperras |
pointlessjon: yeah, more like that |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:24 |
jperras |
it's more of a modelization of how a rating system should function, based on a few assumptions |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:24 |
pointlessjon |
will it simply be the numeric rating where the solution you were describing is just how we get there, or are we going to be looking more at charts |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:23 |
jperras |
we're not really collecting statistics |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:23 |
pointlessjon |
at the end of the day, what kind of statistics will we have? |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:22 |
jperras |
pointlessjon: yup |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:22 |
jperras |
gwoo: ha |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:22 |
pointlessjon |
yeah let me step back -- you mentioned in the spec some crazy stuff about the ratings |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:22 |
jperras |
gaussians and cake? |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:22 |
pointlessjon |
what time is it anyway, like almost 2am? |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:21 |
jperras |
I'm not following |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:21 |
pointlessjon |
you're a fiend for the cake |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:20 |
pointlessjon |
dude i just don't get gaussian distribution |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:20 |
gwoo |
he missed us, all that time with his girlfriend.... |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:20 |
gwoo |
hah |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:19 |
pointlessjon |
but look how hardcore he is |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:19 |
jperras |
I put a jet in your lag so you can jet while you lag, dawg |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:19 |
pointlessjon |
that's what i was thinking |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:19 |
jperras |
yo |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:19 |
gwoo |
haa |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:19 |
gwoo |
pointlessjon: he probably has some major jetlag |
| # |
Jul 22nd 2009, 00:19 |
pointlessjon |
jperras: yo dawg |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 21:20 |
pointlessjon |
!log |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 18:43 |
pointlessjon |
we're pretty much on the same page |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 18:43 |
ProLoser|Work |
gotta head out for a bit |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 18:43 |
ProLoser|Work |
and then you would almost use filters |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 18:42 |
ProLoser|Work |
i mean my suggestion almost seems like 2 sets of tags |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 18:42 |
ProLoser|Work |
honestly how you categorize can be completely arbitrary |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 18:42 |
ProLoser|Work |
that too can make a huge impact |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 18:42 |
pointlessjon |
i totally agree, andat the end of the day it's all user interface |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 18:42 |
ProLoser|Work |
it's up to you |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 18:42 |
ProLoser|Work |
crap i gotta go |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 18:42 |
ProLoser|Work |
so i suggested layers to create a degree of abstraction |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 18:41 |
ProLoser|Work |
when code/articles/tuts are all on the same topic, i would like to see them close together and easily referenceable |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 18:41 |
ProLoser|Work |
in that way i don't think code/articles/tuts/snippets should be the main heirarchy, cuz i don't like that much separation of content |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 18:40 |
ProLoser|Work |
or similar alternative hypothesis on the subject |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 18:40 |
ProLoser|Work |
i don't like the idea of a working peice of code being all the way in another section from discussion articles that may show what lead up to its creation |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 18:40 |
ProLoser|Work |
i just think when i'm looking at code, i can find nearby the relevent documentation on people who use it, examples of how it was used, or alternatives, snippets that led to it |