Log message #905352

# At Username Text
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:42 pointlessjon i totally agree, andat the end of the day it's all user interface
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:42 ProLoser|Work it's up to you
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:42 ProLoser|Work crap i gotta go
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:42 ProLoser|Work so i suggested layers to create a degree of abstraction
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:41 ProLoser|Work when code/articles/tuts are all on the same topic, i would like to see them close together and easily referenceable
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:41 ProLoser|Work in that way i don't think code/articles/tuts/snippets should be the main heirarchy, cuz i don't like that much separation of content
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:40 ProLoser|Work or similar alternative hypothesis on the subject
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:40 ProLoser|Work i don't like the idea of a working peice of code being all the way in another section from discussion articles that may show what lead up to its creation
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:40 ProLoser|Work i just think when i'm looking at code, i can find nearby the relevent documentation on people who use it, examples of how it was used, or alternatives, snippets that led to it
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:39 ProLoser|Work but that's not the point i'm emphasizing
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:39 ProLoser|Work it's all very github/chaw like
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:39 ProLoser|Work it has a team of people working on it, it has an established code section
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:39 ProLoser|Work this is an example module
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:39 ProLoser|Work i am aiming to become as successful as drupal in this endeavor: http://drupal.org/project/modules?filters=tid:75andsolrsort=sort_title%20asc
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:38 ProLoser|Work well
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:38 pointlessjon I'm not sure I'm doing this justice -- I'll just have to show you something visually -- and perhaps you could do the same?
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:37 ProLoser|Work one-off documents?
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:37 ProLoser|Work i was requestion that they establish a form of linking
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:37 pointlessjon Articles, such as tools, tutorial, snippets, are more like one-off documents
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:37 ProLoser|Work i think that's clear they do not plan to mirror that on bakery 2
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:36 pointlessjon including all those things
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:36 pointlessjon as i understand it, code items are becoming almost like github repos or chaw projects
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:36 ProLoser|Work so that usecases and documentation can be built up around it
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:36 ProLoser|Work i'm saying keep code near it's related articles
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:35 ProLoser|Work i'm not saying cause ambiguouty by calling everything code
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:35 ProLoser|Work this is an example of how it's used
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:35 ProLoser|Work this is the code to use
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:35 pointlessjon ah yes, code will have that
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:35 ProLoser|Work 'this is the tutorial
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:35 ProLoser|Work i know, so clearly break it apart into what is what
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:35 pointlessjon if it's in the article section, that article may contain 'code' in it for purposes of demonstration - but it is not meant to be dropped into an app
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:34 ProLoser|Work it would be nice to see the code, plus a tutorial on how to use it, plus snippets pertaining to the same vendor, plus an example of how it could be used, all be found in the same location
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:34 pointlessjon A content, item, node, etc. that is put in the code section contains portable, usable, stable code
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:34 ProLoser|Work and that's pretty much what we have now in bakery 1
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:33 ProLoser|Work i thought you conceded that it creates a blob for the other areas that aren't code
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:33 pointlessjon exactly like the ticket (?)
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:33 ProLoser|Work so how would you organize them?
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:33 ProLoser|Work ?
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:33 pointlessjon err, just aren't
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:33 pointlessjon those are articles with examples of code in them
# Jul 21st 2009, 18:32 pointlessjon no, those just are categorized as code