| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:22 |
_nate_ |
meh, we all have |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:22 |
markstory |
I've written my fair share of poop code. |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:22 |
techno-geek |
markstory's blog posts are extremely useful, I will have to admit that one |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:21 |
_nate_ |
I like the addition of "not poop" |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:21 |
_nate_ |
haha |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:21 |
_nate_ |
techno-geek: yeah, markstory was born awesome |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:21 |
markstory |
make it work, then make it work better / not poop. |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:21 |
_nate_ |
it is better than working with nothing |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:21 |
ProLoser|Work |
!log |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:21 |
_nate_ |
even if the code is really that bad the first time, working with |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:21 |
markstory |
I unlike _nate_, have been super awesome since birth. |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:21 |
techno-geek |
_nate_, ok tnx |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:21 |
_nate_ |
any time you have a question, just let any of us know |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:20 |
techno-geek |
because Im sure I will do something that will need refactored or re-written |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:20 |
_nate_ |
techno-geek: absolutely |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:20 |
techno-geek |
If I start building this app up will you guys work with me on my code design and tell me how to improve it? |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:20 |
ProLoser|Work |
phishy: probably |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:20 |
_nate_ |
and some of it is still in the core :-D |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:20 |
phishy |
just kinda stuck |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:19 |
_nate_ |
also, when I started with Cake, a lot of my code downright sucked |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:19 |
phishy |
i think i stole it from Scrubs |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:19 |
_nate_ |
so you're in good company |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:19 |
_nate_ |
techno-geek: well, he wrote the Oracle driver for Cake, and some other stuff, but he uses the word "funsies" like it's going out of style |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:19 |
techno-geek |
_nate_, no I dont |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:19 |
ProLoser|Work |
lol @ markstory |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:18 |
_nate_ |
techno-geek: you know phishy? |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:18 |
markstory |
so you know I'm super serial |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:18 |
techno-geek |
P |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:18 |
markstory |
yeah. |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:18 |
techno-geek |
this is coming from the same person that uses the word "funsies" |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:18 |
markstory |
never --awesome |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:18 |
techno-geek |
I am quite intimidated by most of the cake devs and I am kind've worried that my code wouldn't be up to par |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:18 |
markstory |
my rule is awesome++ |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:18 |
_nate_ |
nope, just the coding standards page in the Cookbook |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:17 |
techno-geek |
do you have a special hidden handbook somewhere of standards that all Cake devs follow? |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:17 |
_nate_ |
right |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:17 |
ProLoser|Work |
downloading shouldn't require an account too |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:17 |
techno-geek |
yeah I figured you'd eventually do that. |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:16 |
_nate_ |
for the official plugin repository, we can tie it into Bakery logins |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:16 |
_nate_ |
as long as each plugin is attached to some owner and contact information, I don't think we need a formal user system |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:16 |
_nate_ |
well, strictly speaking, I think the user registration can probably be separate |