| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:21 |
_nate_ |
it is better than working with nothing |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:21 |
ProLoser|Work |
!log |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:21 |
_nate_ |
even if the code is really that bad the first time, working with |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:21 |
markstory |
I unlike _nate_, have been super awesome since birth. |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:21 |
techno-geek |
_nate_, ok tnx |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:21 |
_nate_ |
any time you have a question, just let any of us know |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:20 |
techno-geek |
because Im sure I will do something that will need refactored or re-written |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:20 |
_nate_ |
techno-geek: absolutely |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:20 |
techno-geek |
If I start building this app up will you guys work with me on my code design and tell me how to improve it? |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:20 |
ProLoser|Work |
phishy: probably |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:20 |
_nate_ |
and some of it is still in the core :-D |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:20 |
phishy |
just kinda stuck |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:19 |
_nate_ |
also, when I started with Cake, a lot of my code downright sucked |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:19 |
phishy |
i think i stole it from Scrubs |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:19 |
_nate_ |
so you're in good company |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:19 |
_nate_ |
techno-geek: well, he wrote the Oracle driver for Cake, and some other stuff, but he uses the word "funsies" like it's going out of style |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:19 |
techno-geek |
_nate_, no I dont |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:19 |
ProLoser|Work |
lol @ markstory |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:18 |
_nate_ |
techno-geek: you know phishy? |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:18 |
markstory |
so you know I'm super serial |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:18 |
techno-geek |
P |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:18 |
markstory |
yeah. |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:18 |
techno-geek |
this is coming from the same person that uses the word "funsies" |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:18 |
markstory |
never --awesome |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:18 |
techno-geek |
I am quite intimidated by most of the cake devs and I am kind've worried that my code wouldn't be up to par |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:18 |
markstory |
my rule is awesome++ |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:18 |
_nate_ |
nope, just the coding standards page in the Cookbook |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:17 |
techno-geek |
do you have a special hidden handbook somewhere of standards that all Cake devs follow? |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:17 |
_nate_ |
right |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:17 |
ProLoser|Work |
downloading shouldn't require an account too |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:17 |
techno-geek |
yeah I figured you'd eventually do that. |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:16 |
_nate_ |
for the official plugin repository, we can tie it into Bakery logins |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:16 |
_nate_ |
as long as each plugin is attached to some owner and contact information, I don't think we need a formal user system |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:16 |
_nate_ |
well, strictly speaking, I think the user registration can probably be separate |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:15 |
techno-geek |
and then it looked like there was some web app to it as far as getting Users registered and uploading their plugins to the server |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:15 |
_nate_ |
this is the current project |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:15 |
_nate_ |
http://thechaw.com/plugins |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:15 |
_nate_ |
yup, that's pretty much it |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:14 |
techno-geek |
I'm not 100% what all it entails quite yet. All I know is it is supposed to be a plugins client / server type deal and I assumed we'd have a shell for it and stuff like some of the other guys have done recently. |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:14 |
_nate_ |
if it's up your alley, you're welcome to have at it |
| # |
Jul 21st 2009, 13:13 |
_nate_ |
well, it is an important project, and one that's been neglected for a while |