| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:49 |
ProLoser|Work |
vs what? make tickets? |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:49 |
markstory |
I like that people can only comment on things. |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:48 |
alkemann |
markstory: yea linking is ok, i do that for my projects. the "problem" with that is that it makes the article a one way communication. i want to see it become more of a community tool |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:47 |
ProLoser|Work |
meh i'm just trying to keep the code's development and the bakery as connected as possible |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:46 |
markstory |
well nothing lives forever. |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:46 |
ProLoser|Work |
like a new repo i mean |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:46 |
ProLoser|Work |
to the article |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:46 |
ProLoser|Work |
but you can still vote to relink the repo |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:46 |
ProLoser|Work |
ya, it's a problem when the master at that location goes awol |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:45 |
markstory |
a remote repo viewer assumes these repos provide that information. |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:45 |
ProLoser|Work |
lol |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:45 |
ProLoser|Work |
oh, maybe i misread ur punctuation |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:45 |
markstory |
I know, I can read. |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:45 |
ProLoser|Work |
it's only a viewer for remote repos |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:45 |
ProLoser|Work |
that's not /making/ repos |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:44 |
markstory |
I would think just linking to repos would be easier, than making repos like in ProLoser|Work's ticket. |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:44 |
ProLoser|Work |
!log |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:43 |
ProLoser|Work |
lame |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:43 |
ProLoser|Work |
... |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:43 |
alkemann |
but yea, we should not make bakery into a thechaw / github clone. i dont know how to best solve this yet |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:42 |
ProLoser|Work |
seriously am i on mute? http://thechaw.com/bakery/tickets/view/4 |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:41 |
alkemann |
well i guess that depends on how much of that backend we develop and how much we steal from thechaw :p |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:41 |
ProLoser|Work |
did you guys read my ticket about the repo viewer? |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:40 |
alkemann |
author is awol for a time, another person has been updating his fork, others have started requesting commits to this version. at some point it should become the new main code for the article |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:40 |
ADmad |
s/could/cause |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:40 |
ADmad |
agre.. but this would be after the intial release right.. could it would take quite some time to develop all that shit |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:40 |
ProLoser|Work |
wait do you mean a local repo |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:40 |
ProLoser|Work |
i thought you guys didn't like that |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:40 |
alkemann |
and create forks, branches, patches |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:39 |
ProLoser|Work |
... i was talking about that |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:39 |
alkemann |
so people can update easily |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:39 |
alkemann |
i think we really need to have all shared code (not code exmaples) in a repo thing |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:39 |
ADmad |
i didnt know that part.. then it sounds good |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:38 |
ProLoser|Work |
you guys think there should be a master? |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:38 |
alkemann |
sure, but code commits would be against branches or forks, the master would merge into the master head |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:38 |
ADmad |
yeah that was my understanding too |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:38 |
alkemann |
we had some brainstorms in berlin about how to make it a more community tool and one of the ideas i like is that if an author dissapears or wants to give it up, there is a vote or the guy with the most accepted commits becomes the new master |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:37 |
ADmad |
alkemann: if you wikify cant anybody make updates ? |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:37 |
ProLoser|Work |
with moderation, is that a bad thing? |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:36 |
alkemann |
how so? |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:36 |
ADmad |
but on the downside you would lose control over your code.. |