| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:45 |
markstory |
I know, I can read. |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:45 |
ProLoser|Work |
it's only a viewer for remote repos |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:45 |
ProLoser|Work |
that's not /making/ repos |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:44 |
markstory |
I would think just linking to repos would be easier, than making repos like in ProLoser|Work's ticket. |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:44 |
ProLoser|Work |
!log |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:43 |
ProLoser|Work |
lame |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:43 |
ProLoser|Work |
... |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:43 |
alkemann |
but yea, we should not make bakery into a thechaw / github clone. i dont know how to best solve this yet |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:42 |
ProLoser|Work |
seriously am i on mute? http://thechaw.com/bakery/tickets/view/4 |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:41 |
alkemann |
well i guess that depends on how much of that backend we develop and how much we steal from thechaw :p |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:41 |
ProLoser|Work |
did you guys read my ticket about the repo viewer? |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:40 |
alkemann |
author is awol for a time, another person has been updating his fork, others have started requesting commits to this version. at some point it should become the new main code for the article |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:40 |
ADmad |
s/could/cause |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:40 |
ADmad |
agre.. but this would be after the intial release right.. could it would take quite some time to develop all that shit |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:40 |
ProLoser|Work |
wait do you mean a local repo |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:40 |
ProLoser|Work |
i thought you guys didn't like that |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:40 |
alkemann |
and create forks, branches, patches |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:39 |
ProLoser|Work |
... i was talking about that |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:39 |
alkemann |
so people can update easily |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:39 |
alkemann |
i think we really need to have all shared code (not code exmaples) in a repo thing |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:39 |
ADmad |
i didnt know that part.. then it sounds good |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:38 |
ProLoser|Work |
you guys think there should be a master? |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:38 |
alkemann |
sure, but code commits would be against branches or forks, the master would merge into the master head |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:38 |
ADmad |
yeah that was my understanding too |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:38 |
alkemann |
we had some brainstorms in berlin about how to make it a more community tool and one of the ideas i like is that if an author dissapears or wants to give it up, there is a vote or the guy with the most accepted commits becomes the new master |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:37 |
ADmad |
alkemann: if you wikify cant anybody make updates ? |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:37 |
ProLoser|Work |
with moderation, is that a bad thing? |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:36 |
alkemann |
how so? |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:36 |
ADmad |
but on the downside you would lose control over your code.. |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:35 |
ADmad |
yeah the author shouldnt be doged all the time for sharing.. |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:33 |
alkemann |
http://bakery.cakephp.org/leafs/view/72#comment-3880 - im looking forward to the wikify - make community project part of bakery 2.0 , i dont really feel like continuing to support this |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:33 |
ADmad |
with my bitching surely |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:33 |
alkemann |
but will i remember tomorrow? |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:32 |
ADmad |
what for.. you already know :) |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:32 |
alkemann |
post a ticket on my google code :P |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:32 |
ADmad |
kiddin :) |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:31 |
ADmad |
screw them.. |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:30 |
alkemann |
but then i think i will leave my code in for backwards compability for now. as there are enough people out there using it, but it would be more effective to ignore the setting and set 'enabled' false |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:29 |
ADmad |
there must an eg |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:29 |
alkemann |
ok |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 15:29 |
ADmad |
check the test cases |