| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 12:36 |
ProLoser|Work |
please ignore my massive stupidity |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 12:36 |
ProLoser|Work |
bah |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 12:36 |
ProLoser|Work |
wait |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 12:36 |
ProLoser|Work |
i suppose is where i got confused |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 12:35 |
ProLoser|Work |
well what's the pages controller then? |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 12:35 |
ProLoser|Work |
uh |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 12:35 |
markstory |
no way. |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 12:35 |
ProLoser|Work |
ya for some reason i thought that was a join table lol |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 12:32 |
markstory |
so that should clear things up. |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 12:32 |
markstory |
ProLoser|Work: well there are multi page articles. |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 11:15 |
ProLoser|Work |
but i don't get the article_pages_controller |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 11:15 |
ProLoser|Work |
i'm trying to build a similar setup that pretty much is like a multi-page cms, like 'tutorials' or something, and was looking at how you guys did it |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 11:14 |
ProLoser|Work |
is every post in the bakery an article? |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:53 |
ProLoser|Work |
but i'm expecting opposition on that |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:53 |
ProLoser|Work |
and i think would help immensely |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:52 |
ProLoser|Work |
to me it makes a /lot/ of sense |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:52 |
ProLoser|Work |
http://thechaw.com/bakery/tickets/view/9 |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:52 |
ProLoser|Work |
1 sec |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:52 |
gwoo |
link? |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:52 |
ProLoser|Work |
even though #5 is the same thing mainly |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:52 |
ProLoser|Work |
addendum to jon's ticket |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:51 |
gwoo |
ProLoser|Work: where did you make the proposition? |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:42 |
ProLoser|Work |
i made a new proposition for navigation / organization structure in thechaw that may seem a bit strange at first |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:41 |
alkemann |
well i gotta go home for some dinner. laters |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:39 |
gwoo |
yes |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:39 |
alkemann |
especially if we dont put the code bits as part of the article text content |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:39 |
alkemann |
probably |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:39 |
gwoo |
i think single articles will have less revisions too |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:38 |
gwoo |
yeah |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:38 |
alkemann |
gwoo: for the public article this will probably be valuable. less so for single author articles. but space is cheap ;) |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:37 |
ProLoser|Work |
interesting plugin you guys are working on, i'd like to look into using it on my current app |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:37 |
gwoo |
yeah |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:37 |
alkemann |
u think it might be better to just export old revisions as more lro less manual cleanup duty? |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:36 |
alkemann |
the revision behaviour lets u set a limit, if revisions on a particlular record is made with limit reached, it will delete the oldest |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:35 |
gwoo |
once we have tons of revisions |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:35 |
gwoo |
later |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:35 |
gwoo |
we can do archiving |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:35 |
alkemann |
basically a size vs cost of count + delete issue |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:34 |
alkemann |
gwoo: what do you think about limiting the number of revisions that is kept? |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:34 |
gwoo |
good |
| # |
Jul 20th 2009, 10:34 |
alkemann |
it may make more sense to change the order of the behaviours |