| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 17:13 |
ProLoser|Work |
while he would rather go a more drupal/modular route and create a base app that you merely design plugins for |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 17:13 |
ProLoser|Work |
i would rather give people a set of tools that they can attach to their app |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 17:13 |
ProLoser|Work |
we're trying to make very versatile solutions |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 17:12 |
ProLoser|Work |
so you /would/ recommend placing it all in plugins? |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 17:12 |
Phally |
*take |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 17:12 |
Phally |
and how much effort does it make to create three folders and place a file in it? |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 17:11 |
Phally |
well you would have a good level of separation and packaging through the plugins |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 17:10 |
ProLoser|Work |
and would it be worth it to wrap solely a component in a plugin? |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 17:10 |
ProLoser|Work |
is there a reason why a plugin manager server would be made instead of one that also serves out helpers/components/behaviors? |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:48 |
ProLoser|Work |
*crickets* |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:47 |
techno-geek |
ProLoser|Work, see this post http://www.pseudocoder.com/archives/2009/05/29/connecting-cakephp-plugins/ |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:46 |
ProLoser|Work |
or /that/ lol |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:46 |
techno-geek |
and it was in the form of the cakephp plugin conventions? |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:46 |
ProLoser|Work |
on their own they don't make sense techno |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:46 |
techno-geek |
what if there was a standardized way of package, managing, and releasing code? |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:46 |
ProLoser|Work |
although we may want to digress to the original point of the arguments |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:45 |
techno-geek |
am I wrong in the assumption that a Cake plugin can be as small or as large as you want it to be? A simple component all that way to a full mini app? |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:45 |
ProLoser|Work |
lol |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:45 |
alkemann |
possibly :) |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:44 |
ProLoser|Work |
however the sorta question we had would be best commented on by you guys |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:44 |
techno-geek |
oh burn :P |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:44 |
gwoo |
because you were too hungover |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:44 |
ProLoser|Work |
i'm happy to relocate back to our own channel |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:44 |
gwoo |
alkemann: you probably missed my keynote |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:44 |
gwoo |
yes |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:44 |
ProLoser|Work |
gwoo said it'd be good to reserve this channel for advanced discussion not only about bakery development but about the development of components IN the bakery |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:44 |
alkemann |
gwoo has been playing forkmaster and drinking for a week. dont start listening to him before earliest next week |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:43 |
techno-geek |
we are getting wrecked |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:43 |
ProLoser|Work |
we actually moved the discussion to our own channel initially |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:43 |
techno-geek |
gwoo, you need to spread the word man |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:43 |
ProLoser|Work |
well actually it was a topic invited by gwoo |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:43 |
ProLoser|Work |
uh... |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:42 |
ProLoser|Work |
part of why i'm around #bakery i suppose |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:42 |
ProLoser|Work |
and i'm not sure which way is the best |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:42 |
ProLoser|Work |
i have never used debug_kit :/ |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:42 |
techno-geek |
and just a component? |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:41 |
techno-geek |
isn't debug_kit a plugin? |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:41 |
ProLoser|Work |
http://irc.cakephp.org/logs/view/cakephp-bakery |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:41 |
alkemann |
who are you asking this question? |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:41 |
techno-geek |
ProLoser|Work, what stops you from packaging a single component as a plugin? |
| # |
Jul 15th 2009, 16:41 |
ProLoser|Work |
!tell techno-geek about log |