Log message #2298353

# At Username Text
# Sep 21st 2011, 12:54 rchavik 0x20h, quick script http://bin.cakephp.org/view/1654359230, i put it in /etc/profile.d/
# Sep 21st 2011, 12:49 rchavik ~bin
# Sep 21st 2011, 12:48 dogmatic69 no issues with loads of versions
# Sep 21st 2011, 12:46 dakota Ox2Oh: I have cake 1.2, 1.3 and 2.0 projects and I have no issues
# Sep 21st 2011, 12:45 dakota rchavik: that too
# Sep 21st 2011, 12:45 Ox2Oh rchavik: if you have projects with different cake versions it might be a bad idea
# Sep 21st 2011, 12:45 rchavik to work with multiple cake version, i setup aliases and scripts, eg: cake_1_3 and cake_2_0, it then setups the PATH accordingly
# Sep 21st 2011, 12:44 dakota Ox2Oh: I just have a single copy of cake on my server and add it's console path to my PATH variable
# Sep 21st 2011, 12:43 rchavik umm, how is it more handy?
# Sep 21st 2011, 12:40 Ox2Oh bioiq: I usually just issue "lib/Console/Cake/cake bake" (more handy if you have multiple projects)
# Sep 21st 2011, 12:30 bioiq yep
# Sep 21st 2011, 12:29 rchavik in 2.0, it's lib/Cake/Console i believe
# Sep 21st 2011, 12:29 rchavik bioiq, the one that contains cake.bat or cake.php
# Sep 21st 2011, 12:20 bioiq is it the same?
# Sep 21st 2011, 12:20 bioiq sorry, there are two: one in app/Console, the other in lib/Cake/Console which one do i have to export?
# Sep 21st 2011, 12:18 bioiq well, there are a bunch of folders named console
# Sep 21st 2011, 12:17 bioiq there's no folder console... what is the right one to use?
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:55 bioiq ok
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:55 rchavik eg: export PATH=$PATH:~/cake/console
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:54 rchavik yes, as long as you have them on your path
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:53 bioiq ok, i'll dl 2.0... but do i have cake bake commands with the package? do I have to configure them on ubuntu?
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:51 rchavik 1.3 is considered stable, but 2.0 would be out soon. if you're creating new project, might be a good idea to use 2.0 straight away
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:51 bioiq it is better to download the version 1.3 or 2.0?
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:46 rchavik it does.. i've done the same thing.. perhaps you've unbind somewhere
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:43 Tykling yeah, that's what I assumed
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:42 rchavik okay.. even so, the related models should be available in behavior..
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:42 Tykling rchavik: I got it working by using ClassRegistry::init to load the missing models, thanks anyway!
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:41 Tykling could've been the wastebin you were referring to ;)
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:41 Tykling haha sorry, brainfart
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:41 rchavik ~tell Tykling about bin
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:41 Tykling oh lol you mean pastebin
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:41 Tykling rchavik: I don't follow, do you mean throw it away ?
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:40 bioiq yes
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:40 rchavik bioiq, ^
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:40 rchavik ~downloads
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:40 rchavik ~download
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:39 bioiq tnx rchavik, and can u tell me how to get the latest version? is there a way with apt-get?
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:38 rchavik Tykling, you should bin your behavior code
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:27 Tykling which leads me to believe that related models are either not available in behaviors, or that I should do it another way :)
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:26 Tykling $Model->Profile->find gives me error "Undefined property"
# Sep 21st 2011, 11:26 rchavik perhaps $Model->Profile, where $Model is passed as the first argument for behavior's method