| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 12:48 |
dogmatic69 |
no issues with loads of versions |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 12:46 |
dakota |
Ox2Oh: I have cake 1.2, 1.3 and 2.0 projects and I have no issues |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 12:45 |
dakota |
rchavik: that too |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 12:45 |
Ox2Oh |
rchavik: if you have projects with different cake versions it might be a bad idea |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 12:45 |
rchavik |
to work with multiple cake version, i setup aliases and scripts, eg: cake_1_3 and cake_2_0, it then setups the PATH accordingly |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 12:44 |
dakota |
Ox2Oh: I just have a single copy of cake on my server and add it's console path to my PATH variable |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 12:43 |
rchavik |
umm, how is it more handy? |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 12:40 |
Ox2Oh |
bioiq: I usually just issue "lib/Console/Cake/cake bake" (more handy if you have multiple projects) |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 12:30 |
bioiq |
yep |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 12:29 |
rchavik |
in 2.0, it's lib/Cake/Console i believe |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 12:29 |
rchavik |
bioiq, the one that contains cake.bat or cake.php |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 12:20 |
bioiq |
is it the same? |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 12:20 |
bioiq |
sorry, there are two: one in app/Console, the other in lib/Cake/Console which one do i have to export? |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 12:18 |
bioiq |
well, there are a bunch of folders named console |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 12:17 |
bioiq |
there's no folder console... what is the right one to use? |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:55 |
bioiq |
ok |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:55 |
rchavik |
eg: export PATH=$PATH:~/cake/console |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:54 |
rchavik |
yes, as long as you have them on your path |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:53 |
bioiq |
ok, i'll dl 2.0... but do i have cake bake commands with the package? do I have to configure them on ubuntu? |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:51 |
rchavik |
1.3 is considered stable, but 2.0 would be out soon. if you're creating new project, might be a good idea to use 2.0 straight away |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:51 |
bioiq |
it is better to download the version 1.3 or 2.0? |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:46 |
rchavik |
it does.. i've done the same thing.. perhaps you've unbind somewhere |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:43 |
Tykling |
yeah, that's what I assumed |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:42 |
rchavik |
okay.. even so, the related models should be available in behavior.. |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:42 |
Tykling |
rchavik: I got it working by using ClassRegistry::init to load the missing models, thanks anyway! |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:41 |
Tykling |
could've been the wastebin you were referring to ;) |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:41 |
Tykling |
haha sorry, brainfart |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:41 |
rchavik |
~tell Tykling about bin |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:41 |
Tykling |
oh lol you mean pastebin |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:41 |
Tykling |
rchavik: I don't follow, do you mean throw it away ? |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:40 |
bioiq |
yes |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:40 |
rchavik |
bioiq, ^ |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:40 |
rchavik |
~downloads |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:40 |
rchavik |
~download |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:39 |
bioiq |
tnx rchavik, and can u tell me how to get the latest version? is there a way with apt-get? |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:38 |
rchavik |
Tykling, you should bin your behavior code |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:27 |
Tykling |
which leads me to believe that related models are either not available in behaviors, or that I should do it another way :) |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:26 |
Tykling |
$Model->Profile->find gives me error "Undefined property" |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:26 |
rchavik |
perhaps $Model->Profile, where $Model is passed as the first argument for behavior's method |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:24 |
Tykling |
how do I access a related model inside a behavior ? say User actas mybehavior, and User hasone profile, how would I access the profile model inside mybehavior ? |
| # |
Sep 21st 2011, 11:23 |
rchavik |
bioiq, no... you'll be better off getting latest from repo |