| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:31 |
markstory |
yes and no. |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:31 |
alunde |
So if I follow your wisdom, I should get the 1.3 branch. Is that the lastest of the 1.x line? |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:30 |
alunde |
Sorry, I was poking around in my shell. |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:29 |
markstory |
so the biggest difference with git is that when you clone you get a whole repo, not one version. |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:28 |
markstory |
you can setup your gitconfig to make it tracking. |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:28 |
alunde |
Hmmm |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:28 |
markstory |
will checkout a local non-tracking branch of origin/1.3 |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:28 |
markstory |
git checkout -b 1.3 origin/1.3 |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:28 |
markstory |
will show all the available branches. |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:28 |
markstory |
git branch -a |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:28 |
markstory |
yes because you haven't made any local branches yet |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:27 |
markstory |
you have the entire history and all the branches. |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:27 |
alunde |
I seemed to only get the main branch |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:27 |
markstory |
when you clone in git you are doing exactly what it sounds like, cloning the repo. |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:27 |
markstory |
*svn |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:27 |
markstory |
cloning in git is different than checking out in snv. |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:27 |
markstory |
including all the branches. |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:27 |
markstory |
alunde: when you clone you have the whole repo |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:26 |
alunde |
Also it's dated the same as the 1.3-dev tar, so I'm not sure it's very latest anyway. |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:25 |
alunde |
When I did a clone, I got 1.2.5. |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:25 |
iammisc |
SSL is a given |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:24 |
iammisc |
or should i do something more |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:24 |
alunde |
Thanks, How do I get the latest 1.3? |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:24 |
iammisc |
I'm thinking about adding an xmlrpc interface to my site so I could do some administrative things as a local app (instead of using a web interface and increasing bandwidth, which im paying for). For security, is using a simple api key enough. Like i'll define() a var to a random string and I'll use this secret string to authenticate? |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:24 |
Seguer |
anyone used the phpGAcl plugin? |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:24 |
markstory |
what don't you git? |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:24 |
markstory |
sure |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:24 |
alunde |
Can anyone offer a little GIT help to a GIT NOOB? |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:12 |
TehTreag |
unclezoot: Here is an example helper - http://bakery.cakephp.org/articles/view/using-tinymce-with-cakephp#comment-2689, that uses the view as jperras suggests. |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 19:01 |
savant |
well i got it working and you didn't. must be magic :) |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 18:54 |
unclezoot |
lies |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 18:53 |
savant |
i did it with magic and zest |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 18:53 |
unclezoot |
im trying to do it within a layout |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 18:53 |
jperras |
but not from an element |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 18:53 |
jperras |
you can do it from a view |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 18:53 |
unclezoot |
just wondering how savant was able to load his plugin.helper in a layout |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 18:52 |
unclezoot |
i see |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 18:52 |
jperras |
but that kind of thing should be encapsulated into a helper. |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 18:52 |
jperras |
you could get around it by obtaining the view object in the registry and adding your script to it using the relevant method |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 18:51 |
unclezoot |
but loading in the head would be classier :) |
| # |
Sep 13th 2009, 18:51 |
unclezoot |
ive literally just got around it by loading my js and css in my body, i.e. building a string and outputting it |